Welcome to Francis Academic Press
Login | Register

International Journal of Frontiers in Sociology, 2023, 5(6); doi: 10.25236/IJFS.2023.050611.

The Comparative Study on the Theories of Perception between Sarvāstivāda and Sautrāntika

Author(s)

Kang Wang

Corresponding Author:
Kang Wang
Affiliation(s)

Guangzhou Kelin Academy, Guangzhou, 510000, China

Abstract

The Sarvāstivāda assumed that perception (*buddhi) is a direct process, while the Sautrāntika believed that the object is perceived indirectly. The Sarvāstivāda recognized “tri-temporal existence”, while the Sautrāntika insisted that the past and the future do not actually exist. The Sarvāstivāda assumed that the physical assemblage (*saṃcaya) of atoms (paramāṇu) can be directly perceived, and refined the theory of presentational perception. The Sautrāntika, on the other hand, based on the “pursuannt element” (anudhātu), proposed the theory of “consciousness having representational form (ākāra)”. Therefore, the cognition of the external object is indirect, and the direct object of cognition is the unified complex (*sārnagrī) of atoms, by which the Sautrāntika refined its theory of representational perception.

Keywords

Perception, *Saṃcaya, Sahabhū-hetu, Pratyakṣa, Anudhātu, Ākāra, *Sārnagrī

Cite This Paper

Kang Wang. The Comparative Study on the Theories of Perception between Sarvāstivāda and Sautrāntika. International Journal of Frontiers in Sociology (2023), Vol. 5, Issue 6: 64-68. https://doi.org/10.25236/IJFS.2023.050611.

References

[1] Buswell R. E. Jr. and Jaini P. S, “The Development of Abhidharma Philosophy”. [J]. vol.7, no2, pp. 73-119, 2005.

[2] Cousin L. S, “On the Vibhajyavādins: The Mahiṃsāsaka, Dhammaguttaka, Kassapiya and Tambapaṇṇiya branches of the ancient Theriyas”. [J]. Buddhist Studies Review. vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 131-182, 2001. 

[3] Dhammajoti K.L, “Sarvāstivāda Abhidharma”. [M]. Sri Lanka: Centre for Buddhist Studies. pp. 51, 2015.

[4] Dhammajoti K.L, “Abhidharma Doctrines and Controversies on Perception”. [M]. Hong Kong: Centre of Buddhist Studies the University of Hong Kong, pp. 142, 2007. 

[5] D.J., Kalupahana. Buddhist Philosophy - A historical Analysis [M]. Honolulu, University of Hawaii. pp.81, 1992. 

[6] Katō  Junshō. Kyōryōbu no kenkyū. [M]. Tokyo: Shunjūsha. pp. 309-313, 1989. 

[7] La Vallée-Poussin, Louis de. Abhidharmakośabhāṣyam, trans. Leo M. Pruden. [M]. Paris: Librairie Orientaliste Paul Geuthner. pp.346, 1990. 

[8] May Jacques. Candrakīrti Prasannapadā Madhyamakavṛtti [M]. Paris: Adrien-Maisonneuve. pp. 113-114, 1959.

[9] Stcherbatsky T. 1930-1932. Buddhist Logic. 2 vols. Leningrad: Bibliotheca Buddhica. [M]. New York: Dover Publications, pp. 138, 1962.