In the context of globalization, the practice of international social governance is at a new turning point. In order to promote the construction of global order, innovative paths of international social governance need to be explored in terms of practice. From the perspective of system construction, the international social governance system is analyzed. The necessity of innovation in international social governance is also analyzed from three aspects: governance structure, governance model and governance system. On this basis, specific innovation paths are proposed, including the diversification of governance subjects, the construction of a community of responsibility and the optimization of governance structures, aiming to promote the reform and construction of the international social governance system and to promote the practice of global governance in a diversified way.

Zhima Luosang. Exploring the innovation path of international social governance in the context of globalization. International Journal of New Developments in Engineering and Society (2023) Vol.7, Issue 7: 1-8. https://doi.org/10.25236/IJNDES.2023.070701.

[1] Huang D. Environmental, social and governance (ESG) activity and firm performance: a review and consolidation[J]. Accounting and Finance, 2021, 61(1):335-360.

[2] Singhania M, Saini N. Systems approach to environment, social and governance (ESG): Case of Reliance industries[J]. Sustainable Operations and Computers, 2022, 3:103-117.

[3] Linnenluecke M K. Environmental, social and governance (ESG) performance in the context of multinational business research[J]. Multinational Business Review, 2022, 30(1):1-16.

[4] Kim S. A participatory local governance approach to social innovation: A case study of Seongbuk-gu, South Korea: [J]. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 2022, 40(1):201-220.

[5] Isaeva K V. The impact of digitalization of the economy upon social governance: analysis of current global trends [J]. Национальная Безопасность / Nota Bene, 2021(2):1-7.

[6] Lei J A, Xiang H B. Analysis of social governance in energy-oriented cities based on artificial intelligence [J]. Energy Reports, 2022, 8:11151-11160.

[7] Teng S, Li H, Zhang D. Invested Costs and Risk Control Model of Social Governance Based on Fuzzy Algorithm[J]. Security and Communication Networks, 2022, 2022(2):1-10.

[8] Jie B, Onk A. A Comparison of Genitourinary Society Pathology and International Society of Urological Pathology Prostate Cancer Guidelines – ScienceDirect [J]. European Urology, 2021, 79(1):3-5.

[9] Bourceret, Amélie, Amblard L , Mathias J D .Adapting the governance of social–ecological systems to behavioural dynamics: An agent-based model for water quality management using the theory of planned behaviour[J].Ecological Economics, 2022, 194:35-63.

[10] Brandon R D, Rdn L, Csr D, et al. The International Society of Renal Nutrition and Metabolism Commentary on the National Kidney Foundation and Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics KDOQI Clinical Practice Guideline for Nutrition in Chronic Kidney Disease[J]. Journal of Renal Nutrition, 2021, 31(2):116-120.

[11] Patel H, Tan C J, Yi L T, et al. Educational needs of oncology pharmacists: a survey by the International Society of Oncology Pharmacy Practitioners:[J]. Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice, 2021, 27(3):623-634.

[12] Mc A, Actp B, He C, et al. Anal cancer in older adults: a Young International Society of Geriatric Oncology review paper [J]. Journal of Geriatric Oncology, 2022, 13(7):914-923.

[13] Goldin K J. Response from the International Society of Medical Publication Professionals (ISMPP) [J]. BMJ, 2021, 339(12):782-790.

[14] Loddo A, Djokovic D, Drizi A, et al. Hysteroscopic myomectomy: The guidelines of the International Society for Gynecologic Endoscopy (ISGE) [J]. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 2022, 268:121-128. 

[15] Wang L, Wang K, Wang H. Complexity Analysis of Urban Governance from Perspective of System Theory [J]. Computer Simulation, 2022(7)1-6, 45.