Normal students are an important force for the development of sports in our country. They undertake an important task for the training of future sports talents. However, from the perspective of principal-agent, public funded normal students of physical education are faced with a series of dilemmas, such as asymmetric information and inconsistent goals among the government, universities and public funded normal students of physical education, and adverse selection and moral hazard appear in the principal-agent relationship between the government, universities and public funded normal students. This paper aims to explore the dilemma of public sports education, and put forward some suggestions for path optimization, as well as to provide reference for the training of public sports education normal students.

Yuan Kaili. Research on the Training Dilemma and Path Optimization of Publicly-Funded Normal College Students in Physical Education Major from the Perspective of Agency. Frontiers in Sport Research (2023) Vol. 5, Issue 12: 56-65. https://doi.org/10.25236/FSR.2023.051210.

[1] Wu Dongzhao, Wang Yunlai, Cao Taisheng, et al. Policy innovation and practice review of public education for normal college students [J]. China Education Journal, 2019, No.319(11): 89-93.

[2] Liang Qinchao, Chen Bo, Li Yuan. Research on the training of free sports normal university students in China [J]. Sports Culture Guide, 2017, (08): 160-164.

[3] ZHAO Wenxue. Home-school Cooperation from the perspective of principal-agent [J]. Teaching and Management, 2018, (17): 6-8.

[4] Zhang Shanchao, Jin Yule. Difficulties and Breakthroughs in senior high School academic Level Examination Reform: An Analysis based on principal-Agent Theory [J]. Science of Education, 2019, 35(01): 48-53.

[5] Sun Cuixiang, Wang Zhengang. School Reform from the Perspective of "Principal-agent" Relationship: Problems and Strategies [J]. Research in Educational Sciences, 2013, No.221(08): 40-45.

[6] XU Ziqiang, ZHAO Yanxin. Risk assessment and countermeasures of public education Policy implementation for normal college students [J]. Heilongjiang Higher Education Research, 2022, 40(12): 33-40.

[7] Cao Jing, Ma Yufang. Research on the existing problems and countermeasures of public funded normal college students' education policies [J]. Heilongjiang Higher Education Research, 2019, 37(05): 79-82.

[8] Li Delin, Chen Chen. Modern rural normal schools and their enlightenment to the training of government-funded normal students [J]. Journal of Jinan University (Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 32(06): 157-165.

[9] Ma Zhaopeng, Bai Ling, Li Mingshuang. Research Progress of Free Education of Normal University students and Research Ideas of Public Education: A visual analysis based on CiteSpace [J]. Journal of Teacher Education, 2019, 6(05): 11-19.

[10] Feng Xizhen, Wu Xiuyun, Yang Xiaochao, et al. Current situation and relationship between academic responsibility and academic procrastination of free normal college students [J]. Educational Theory and Practice, 2017, 37(27): 32-35. (in Chinese)

[11] Zhang Xin-Liang, Shi Yan, Zheng Qi, et al. An Empirical Study on the Academic Performance of Public funded Normal students: Based on the administrative data of a normal university [J]. Journal of Education, 2023, 19(01): 165-181.

[12] Qian Fang, Guo Yuhan. Research on the implementation of government-funded normal college students and policy suggestions [J]. Chinese Teachers, 2019, (06): 11-16.

[13] Liang Fengbo, Mao Zhenming, Cheng Tianyou, etc. "Healthy China 2030" Planning Outline and School Physical Education Reform Policy (3) Goal: Ensure that students have no less than one hour of physical activity per day in school [J]. Wuhan Institute of Physical Education Journal of Chinese Journal of Science and Technology, 2018,52(07):82-87.

[14] Zheng Chongde, Committee of the Board of Governance. The realistic dilemma and development strategy of sports support education in China in the new era [J]. Journal of Luoyang Normal University, 2022, 41(08): 38-41.

[15] Sun Keji. Exploration of "double first-class" policy implementation optimization path based on principal-agent theory [J]. Higher Education Exploration, 2019, No.199(11): 9-15.

[16] Su Shangfeng, Chang Yue. Local public funded normal college student policy and retention mechanism of rural education [J]. Journal of Hebei Normal University (Education Science Edition), 2020, 22(02): 73-79. (in Chinese)

[17] He Yunfeng, Song Dan. The principal-agent relationship of universities' emphasis on research but not on teaching under the background of "Five" [J]. Educational Theory and Practice, 2022, 42(12): 13-17.

[18] Ding Zhi-Guo, Guo Ting-Ting. Rational engagement: A review of the development of modern contract theory [J]. Learning and Exploration, 2018, (03): 114-122.

[19] Yang Xiaofan, Ma Duo. Research on the Practical Dilemma and Improvement Path of Subject Teaching Knowledge (PCK) of P.E. Public funded Normal University students [J]. Sports Research and Education, 2020, 35(03): 48-52.

[20] Li Yudong. On the multi-layer principal-agent relationship in Education [J]. China Education Journal, 2015, (06): 63-68.

[21] Liu Jianwei, Yuan Qingsheng, Shi Yanxin, et al. Research on course teaching reform based on cooperation and win-win mechanism [J]. China Electric Power Education, 2014, No.304(09): 107-108.

[22] GE Xiaoming. Study on win-win Mechanism and Implementation Path of School-Enterprise Cooperation under "3+1" talent Training Model [J]. Journal of Jilin University of Business and Technology, 2018, 34(05): 108-111, 122.