Welcome to Francis Academic Press

International Journal of Frontiers in Sociology, 2023, 5(16); doi: 10.25236/IJFS.2023.051610.

Study on Copyright Protection of Artificial Intelligence Products---A Case Study of "Nearest Entrance to Heaven"

Author(s)

Yanke Shen

Corresponding Author:
Yanke Shen
Affiliation(s)

School of Intellectual Property, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing, China

Abstract

The large-scale application of artificial intelligence in the field of literature and art is the focus of attention all over the world, which brings new challenges to the traditional copyright system. Artificial intelligence products involve many issues such as legal subjects, protection modes, rights ownership and so on. At present, the American intellectual property academic circles have put forward the theory of expanding the scope of identification of deductive works, employment works and artificial intelligence virtual authorial identity to protect artificial intelligence products and solve the problem of copyright ownership. In order to build the copyright protection mechanism of artificial intelligence products in China, this paper discusses the latest theoretical research in the United States, and suggests that China should use the artificial intelligence copyright protection model and apply the employment work protection model to attribute the rights of artificial intelligence products to employers, including artificial intelligence investors, creators and users.

Keywords

Artificial intelligence products; Copyright ability; Copyright protection and ownership

Cite This Paper

Yanke Shen. Study on Copyright Protection of Artificial Intelligence Products---A Case Study of "Nearest Entrance to Heaven". International Journal of Frontiers in Sociology (2023), Vol. 5, Issue 16: 58-65. https://doi.org/10.25236/IJFS.2023.051610.

References

[1] Amir H. Khoury, Intellectual Property Rights For ‘Hubots’: On The Legal Implications Of Human-Like Robots As Innovators And Creators, Cardozo Arts and Entertainment Law Journal, (2017),635-668.

[2] Annemarie Bridy, Coding Creativity: Copyright And the Artificially Intelligent Author,Stanford Technology Law Review, 2012

[3] Butler T L, Can A Computer Be An Author-copyright aspects of artificial intelligence? , Comm/Ent LS, (1981), 707.

[4] Jian Z , Silu X , Xijing L .Feasibility study of launching mobile-based postgraduate research products based on artificial intelligence[J].  2021.

[5] Stephen M. McJohn, Examples & Explanations for Intellectual Property, Fifth Edition, Netherlands: Wolters Kluwer Law & Business,(2015),15-17.

[6] Feng Xiaoqing, Research on Labor Theory of Intellectual Property Rights, Journal of Social Sciences of Xiangtan University, 27 (2003), 24-29.

[7] Jaishy S , Ito N , Kawabe Y .Problem Solving with Interactive-Theorem Proving - A Case Study[J]. IEEE, 2016.DOI:10.1109/ACIT-CSII-BCD.2016.064.

[8] Tan Biyun, The copyright ownership of Intelligent robot's creation "works", Journal of Heilongjiang Provincial Political Science and Law Management Cadre Institute ", 2017 (3),56-58.

[9] Wu Handong, Research on Fundamental Issues of Intellectual Property (1st edition), China Renmin University Press,(2005), 186.

[10] Yang Yanchao, The Challenge of Artificial Intelligence to Intellectual Property Law, Governance Research (formerly Journal of Zhejiang Provincial Party School) ,(2018)5, 120-128.