Welcome to Francis Academic Press

Academic Journal of Medicine & Health Sciences, 2024, 5(3); doi: 10.25236/AJMHS.2024.050303.

Sensory-motor coupling and its neural mechanisms

Author(s)

Wang Yue, Zheng Chenhao

Corresponding Author:
Wang Yue
Affiliation(s)

Shandong Normal University, Jinan, China

Abstract

When humans perform sensorimotor tasks, such as practicing a violin piece, it leads to a strong coupling between the sensory cortex and the motor cortex, and this connection and integration between the sensory and motor systems is called sensory-motor coupling. In this paper, we systematically review the concept, manifestations and neural mechanisms of sensory-motor coupling, and review the relevant researches, and find that there is a bidirectional relationship between sensory coding and motor coding, and this coupling between sensory system and motor system has a wide range of manifestations in nature and human society, and there is research evidence at the neural level. Future research should further explore: (1) the association between sensory-motor coupling in audio-visual channels; and (2) channel-based differences in sensory-motor coupling.

Keywords

Sensory-motor coupling; Neural mechanisms; Rhythm perception

Cite This Paper

Wang Yue, Zheng Chenhao. Sensory-motor coupling and its neural mechanisms. Academic Journal of Medicine & Health Sciences (2024), Vol. 5, Issue 3: 12-16. https://doi.org/10.25236/AJMHS.2024.050303.

References

[1] Prinz, W. (1997). Perception and Action Planning. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 9(2), 129-154.

[2] Prinz, W. (2013). Perception and action planning: strong interactions. Ecological Psychology, 36(3), 14-14.

[3] Rizzolatti, G., & Sinigaglia, C. (2010). The functional role of the parieto-frontal mirror circuit: Interpretations and misinterpretations. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 11(4), 264-274.

[4] Novembre, G., & Keller, P. E. (2014). A conceptual review on action-perception coupling in the musicians’ brain: What is it good for? Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8.

[5] James, W. (1890). The Principles of Psychology (Vol. 2). New York: Holt.

[6] Sperry, R. W. (1952). Neurology and the mind-body problem. Am. Sci. 40, 12-291.

[7] Hommel, B., Müsseler, J., Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W. (2001). The Theory of Event Coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action planning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24(5), 849-878.

[8] Kornblum, S., Hasbroucq, T., & Osman, A. (1990). Dimensional overlap: Cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility--a model and taxonomy. Psychological Review, 97(2), 253-270.

[9] Hommel, B. (2009). Action control according to TEC (theory of event coding). Psychological Research, 73(4), 512-526. 

[10] Drost, U. C., Rieger, M., Brass, M., Gunter, T. C., and Prinz, W. (2005a). Actioneffect coupling in pianists. Psychol. Res. 69, 233-241.

[11] Drost, U. C., Rieger, M., Brass, M., Gunter, T. C., and Prinz, W. (2005b). When hearing turns into playing: movement induction by auditory stimuli in pianists. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. A 58, 1376-1389.

[12] D’Ausilio, A., Altenmüller, E., Olivetti Belardinelli, M., and Lotze, M. (2006). “Cross-modal plasticity of the motor cortex while listening to a rehearsed musical piece”. Eur. J. Neurosci. 24, 955-958.

[13] Bangert, M., Peschel, T., Schlaug, G., Rotte, M., Drescher, D., Hinrichs, H., et al. (2006). Shared networks for auditory and motor processing in professional pianists: evidence from fMRI conjunction. Neuroimage 30, 917–926.

[14] Lahav, A., Saltzman, E., and Schlaug, G. (2007). Action representation of sound: audiomotor recognition network while listening to newly acquired actions. J. Neurosci. 27, 308-314.

[15] Etzel, J. A., Valeria, G., Christian, K., & Bernhard, B. .(2008). Testing simulation theory with cross- modal multivariate classification of fmri data. Plos One, 3(11), e3690.

[16] Levy-Tzedek, S., Krebs, H. I., Arle, J. E., Shils, J. L., & Poizner, H. (2011). Rhythmic movement in Parkinson's disease: effects of visual feedback and medication state. Experimental brain research, 211(2), 277-286.

[17] Del Olmo, M. F., & Cudeiro, J. (2005). Temporal variability of gait in Parkinson disease: Effects of a rehabilitation programme based on rhythmic sound cues. Parkinsonism & Related Disorders, 11(1), 25-33.

[18] Morris, M. E., Iansek, R., Matyas, T. A., & Summers, J. J. (1996). Stride length regulation in Parkinson’s disease: Normalization strategies and underlying mechanisms. Brain, 119(2),551-568.

[19] Fraisse, P. (1948). Rythmes auditifs et rythmes visuels [Auditory and visual rhythms]. L’Anne´e Psychologique, 49, 21-41.

[20] Repp, B. H. (2005). Sensorimotor synchronization: A review of the tapping literature. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12(6), 969-992.

[21] Repp, B. H., & Su, Y. H. (2013). Sensorimotor synchronization: a review of recent research (2006-2012). Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20(3), 403-452.

[22] Gan, L., Huang, Y., Zhou, L., Qian, C., & Wu, X. (2015). Synchronization to a bouncing ball with a realistic motion trajectory. Scientific Reports, 5, 11974.

[23] Barakat, B., Seitz, A. R., & Shams, L. (2015). Visual rhythm perception improves through auditory but not visual training. Current Biology, 25(2), 60-61.