Welcome to Francis Academic Press

The Frontiers of Society, Science and Technology, 2024, 6(3); doi: 10.25236/FSST.2024.060308.

Quantitative Evaluation of Policies Linking the Increase and Decrease of Urban and Rural Construction Land: A PMC Index Model Approach

Author(s)

Jie Yuan

Corresponding Author:
Jie Yuan
Affiliation(s)

School of Public Administration, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610065, China

Abstract

The policy of linking increases and decreases effectively alleviates urban land use conflicts and is a major boost to rural revitalization. This article combines text mining with the PMC index model to conduct a quantitative evaluation and analysis of the selected 35 representative policy texts of linking the increase and decrease. The results show that: the internal consistency of the 35 policies of linking the increase and decrease is generally at a good level. The central-level policies are obviously strategic, co-ordinated and comprehensive. The evaluation results of policies of linking the increase and decrease among the eastern, central, western and northeastern regions are difference. Based on the results, the following suggestions are put forward: building a collaborative governance system among departments, effectively encouraging the participation of social forces, and balancing the use structure of policy tools.

Keywords

Linking the increase and decrease of urban and rural construction land, policy formulation, text mining, PMC index model

Cite This Paper

Jie Yuan. Quantitative Evaluation of Policies Linking the Increase and Decrease of Urban and Rural Construction Land: A PMC Index Model Approach. The Frontiers of Society, Science and Technology (2024), Vol. 6, Issue 3: 49-58. https://doi.org/10.25236/FSST.2024.060308.

References

[1] He Xuefeng. The logic and fallacies of the policy linking the increase and decrease of urban and rural construction land [J]. Academic Monthly, 2019, 51(01):96-104.

[2] Gao Xuelian. Research progress and debates on policy evaluation methodology [J]. Theoretical Discussion, 2009(05):139-142.

[3] Zhang Yongan, Zhou Yiyuan. Excavation and quantitative evaluation of new energy vehicle subsidy policy tools [J]. China Population· Resources and Environment, 2017, 27(10): 188-197.

[4] Estrada, M. A. R. Policy Modeling: Definition, Classification and Evaluation [J]. Journal of Policy Modeling, 2011, 22(4):523-536.

[5] Estrada, M. The policy modeling research consistency index (PMC-Index) [J]. SSRN Electronic Journal, 2010.

[6] Bu Lingtong, Xu Yanan, Zhang Jiawei, Zhu Yijie. Quantitative evaluation of China’s maker space policy from 2015 to 2020 [J]. China Science and Technology Forum, 2021(07):46-56.

[7] Lu Zhaodi, Zhang Zhengfeng, Ji Zengsheng. Quantitative evaluation of homestead management policies based on the policy modeling consistency index model [J]. Chinese Land Science, 2021, 35(10): 115-124.

[8] Hu Chunyan, Zhang Lianming. Is the implementation effect of "good" policies also good? : An empirical test based on error tolerance and error correction policies [J]. Public Administration Review, 2021, 14(03): 4-23+196.

[9] Bannikova L, Boronina L. Training of Engineers for Innovation: Request Evaluation[J].University Management: Practice and Analysis, 2016.DOI:10.15826/umj.2016.103.014.