Welcome to Francis Academic Press

The Frontiers of Society, Science and Technology, 2024, 6(4); doi: 10.25236/FSST.2024.060406.

Environmental Impact Assessment System: Historical Institutional Analysis of Trail, Logic, and Evolutionary Dynamics

Author(s)

Huang Linzhu

Corresponding Author:
Huang Linzhu
Affiliation(s)

School of Public Administration, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China

Abstract

From the analytical perspective of historical institutionalism, a comprehensive review of the tortuous historical process of the environmental impact assessment system can be found: since the formal establishment of China's environmental impact assessment system in 1979, it has gone through three phases: the system initiation period, the system standardisation period, and the system diversion period, and it is currently in the system equilibrium period. Accompanied by the transformation of China's ecological and environmental concepts, the transformation of the mode of economic development and the process of administrative system reform, the development of the system is characterised by path-dependence; top-down changes are still achieved under the impetus of the Party's conceptual innovation and self-revolution, as well as the EIA storm in 2015. In the new equilibrium stage, the EIA system should focus on strategic EIA and further seek to connect with other environmental protection systems, such as the sewage licensing system, to achieve institutional development; at the same time, by strengthening industry self-regulation, the system should avoid falling into vicious path dependence.

Keywords

environmental impact assessment system; historical institutionalism; path dependence; institutional change

Cite This Paper

Huang Linzhu. Environmental Impact Assessment System: Historical Institutional Analysis of Trail, Logic, and Evolutionary Dynamics. The Frontiers of Society, Science and Technology (2024), Vol. 6, Issue 4: 39-47. https://doi.org/10.25236/FSST.2024.060406.

References

[1] Zhao Eiyu and Jiang Qinqin.(2010). 40 Years of the U.S. Environmental Impact Assessment System and Commentary. Contemporary Law,(1),133-143.

[2] Zhao Yuting, Zhan Liwen, Li Xiaomin, Li Linzi, and Yao Yihuan.(2022). Research Progress of Domestic and International Strategic Environmental Impact Assessment Based on CiteSpace Analysis. Journal of Environmental Engineering and Technology,(6),1746-1753.

[3] Xiao Qiang and Wang Hailong.(2015). A Review of the Design of the Current Law System for Public Participation in Environmental Impact Assessment. Journal of Law,(12),60-70.

[4] Shijin Gang, Zhang Mingbo, Zhao Yiwei, Zhao Fang, and Dong Xuhui.(2020). Progress, Challenges and Suggestions for Countermeasures of China's Planning EIA System. China Environmental Management, (6),43-46.

[5] Chai Xilong, Zou Shiying, Li Yuanshi, and Du Yunhui.(2016). Research on the interface between environmental impact assessment and emission permit system. Environmental Impact Assessment, (2),25-27.

[6] Tian Yiyao and Xu Yazhou.(2022). Theoretical Coupling, Institutional Dilemma and Normative Reconstruction of the Interface between Planning Environmental Impact Assessment and Territorial Spatial Planning. Arid Zone Resources and Environment, (10),8-17.

[7] Tan Minqiang.(2022). Progress and Prospects of the Interface of Environmental Impact Assessment, Emission Permit, and Ecological and Environmental Enforcement Systems. Environmental Impact Assessment, (4),12-16.

[8] Yang Yiting and Xu He.(2022). Practice and Prospect of China's Environmental Impact Assessment System--Review of the 20th Anniversary of the EIA Law. Journal of Environmental Engineering and Technology, 6, 1719-1726.

[9] He Xiangbai.(2017). Rethinking and Changing the Environmental Impact Assessment System in the Context of Risk Society--Taking Changzhou Foreign Language School's "Poisoned Land" Incident as an Entry Point. Law Review, (1),128-137.

[10] Shen Kun.(2022). The History of Institutions and the Institutions in History--On the Historical and Institutional Views of Historical Institutionalism. Social Science Vertical and Horizontal, 12, 117-119.

[11] He Junzhi. (2004). Structure, History and Behavior - The Reconstruction of Political Science by Historical Institutionalism. Shanghai: Fudan University Press.

[12] Liu Jianwei.(2011). The Evolution of the Chinese Communist Party's Understanding of Environmental Issues after the Founding of the People's Republic of China. Journal of Theory, 10, 12-14.

[13] Li Jiaxin.(2007). Toward a Green Future-The Emergence and Development of the Concept of Global Environmental Governance. Southern Journal, 3, 11-22.

[14] Qu Geping.(2000). Zhou Enlai, Pioneer and Founder of Environmental Protection in New China. Party Literature, 2, 84-88.

[15] Zhao Eiyu and Jiang Qinqin.(2010). 40 Years of the U.S. Environmental Impact Assessment System and Commentary. Contemporary Law, 1, 133-143.

[16] Wang Xi and Guo Xiang.(2021). Comparison of the Functions of EIA Systems in China and the United States: Supervision or Regulation? Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology (Social Science Edition), 1, 114-126.

[17] Zhang Kangzhi.(2003). Reform of the Administrative Approval System: Government from Control to Service. Theory and Reform, 6, 42-45.

[18] Paul Pierson.(2000). Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics. American Political Science Review, (2), 251-267.

[19] Shi Xiaohong, Geng Gangde and Li Huai.(2014). A New Explanation of the Theory of "Path Dependence". The Economist, 6, 53-64.

[20] Bao Cunkuan.(2015). Reform of the Environmental Impact Assessment System Should Focus on Returning to the Essence of EIA. China Environmental Management, 3, 33-39.

[21] Zhao Hui and Zhu Lingjun.(2003). Historical Institutionalism and Its Basic Characteristics from the New Institutionalism. Social Science Research, 4, 24-29.

[22] Pan Yue.(2005). Strategic EIA and Sustainable Development. Environmental Economics, 9, 11-15.

[23] Xie Haibo.(2021). Rule of Law Problems and Solution Paths of Environmental Impact Assessment Administrative Approval Reform in the Context of "Putting in Control and Serving". Journal of Nanjing University of Technology (Social Science Edition), 2, 26-36.

[24] Wu Jing, Wang Wenqi, and Zhang Yixin.(2019). Reform Trends and Reform Proposals for Environmental Impact Assessment at Home and Abroad--Taking the Multi-Source Stream Framework as a Perspective. Environmental Protection, (1), 9-15.

[25] Zhao Xusheng.(2018). On the Self-Revolution of the Communist Party of China in the New Era. Journal of the Party School of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China, 5, 81-88.

[26] Wang Yi.(2003). Restricting Freedom with Rules - A Dialogue with Prof. Du Gangjian of the National School of Administration on the Reform of the Administrative Approval System. China Reform, 3, 39-41.

[27] Chen Zewei.(2009). Facing Up to "EIA Corruption". Outlook, 17, 40-41.

[28] Ma Deyong.(2018). Historical Institutionalism's Theory of Gradual Institutional Change--Another Essay on Its Applicability in China. Comparison of Economic and Social Systems, (5), 158-170.

[29] Jin Hai and Wang Yingfang.(2015). Reform of the EIA Approval System: Progress, Problems and Countermeasures. Environmental Protection, 10, 32-36.