Welcome to Francis Academic Press

The Frontiers of Society, Science and Technology, 2024, 6(4); doi: 10.25236/FSST.2024.060409.

A Study on Identity Construction of China-US Cross-border E-commerce Enterprises from the Perspective of Discourse-Historical Analysis

Author(s)

Wang Yayao

Corresponding Author:
Wang Yayao
Affiliation(s)

Xi'an International Studies University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China, 710128

Abstract

This study utilizes the 2022 annual reports of Alibaba and Amazon as its corpus and adopts a discourse analysis three-dimensional framework within the context of discourse history research. The research path begins with an examination of discourse strategy, specifically focusing on the implementation methods and language characteristics in constructing corporate identity in China and the United States. Through the analysis of referential strategies, declarative strategies, and perspective strategies, this paper elucidates the differences and distinctive features of discourse strategies used for identity construction in Chinese and American enterprises. Additionally, it aims to establish a comparative research framework for discourse strategies in identity construction between Chinese and foreign enterprises, offering insights for further exploration in this field.

Keywords

discourse-historical analysis; identity construction; e-commerce enterprises

Cite This Paper

Wang Yayao. A Study on Identity Construction of China-US Cross-border E-commerce Enterprises from the Perspective of Discourse-Historical Analysis. The Frontiers of Society, Science and Technology (2024), Vol. 6, Issue 4: 62-66. https://doi.org/10.25236/FSST.2024.060409.

References

[1] Benwell, B., & Stokoe, E. (2006). Discourse and identity. Edinburgh University Press.

[2] Chai, G., & Han, H. (2017). An Interpersonal Pragmatic Study of Relational Identity in Government Business Promotion Discourse. Foreign Language Teaching, (1), 49-54.

[3] Chen, J. P. (2016). A Comparative Study on Institutional Identity Discourse Construction in Chinese and Foreign Universities. Chinese Language Learning, (4), 29-39.

[4] Chen, J. P. (2017). A Comparative Study of Discourse Construction Strategies of Institutional Identity in Chinese, British, and American Universities. Modern Foreign Languages, (1), 24-36.

[5] Chen, X. R. (2014). Identity Research from the Perspective of Pragmatics: Key Issues and Major Paths. Modern Foreign Languages, (5), 702-710.

[6] Lippincott, G., & Margulies, W. (1960). The Corporate Image. Journal of Business Identity Construction, 5(2), 123-137.

[7] Rayson, P. (2008). From key words to key semantic domains. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 13(4), 519-549.

[8] Shi, X. S., & Shan, X. H. (2019). Exploring the Cross-cultural Adaptation Level of Chinese Enterprise Websites Based on Corpus Analysis. Chinese Language Learning, (2), 71-80.

[9] Sun, Y., & Jiang, J. L. (2014). Metaphor Use in Chinese and American Corporate Mission Statements: A Cognitive Sociolinguistic Analysis. English for Specific Purposes, 33(2), 4-14.

[10] Wu, N., & Zhang, J. Y. (2019). Discourse Construction Strategies of Institutional Identity in Chinese and American Enterprises. Modern Foreign Languages, (2), 220-230.