Welcome to Francis Academic Press

International Journal of Frontiers in Sociology, 2024, 6(4); doi: 10.25236/IJFS.2024.060415.

Research on Plaintiff Qualifications of China's Environmental Public Interest Litigation

Author(s)

Guo Li

Corresponding Author:
Guo Li
Affiliation(s)

Anhui University of Finance and Economics, Bengbu, Anhui, China, 233000

Abstract

To protect the ecological environment, it is necessary to establish a more scientific system of environmental public interest litigation. At present, China's relevant systems are still in the initial stage, and improving the plaintiff's qualifications in environmental public interest litigation is a key step in promoting the development of environmental public interest litigation. In the judicial practice of our country, there are still problems where individual citizens have not been granted the plaintiff's main identity, environmental protection organizations have defects in their plaintiff's main identity, administrative agencies need to clarify their plaintiff's main identity, and procuratorial agencies have incomplete plaintiff's main identity. China should base itself on its national conditions, carefully draw on the scope of subjects that countries have the right to initiate environmental public interest litigation, grant individual citizens and clarify the plaintiff qualification of administrative agencies in environmental public interest litigation, relax the restrictions on social organizations initiating environmental public interest litigation, clarify the role of public prosecution agencies in environmental public interest litigation, and clarify the order of multiple subjects to sue, to establish a more scientific system for the qualification of plaintiffs in environmental public interest litigation.

Keywords

Environmental public interest litigation, Plaintiff qualifications, Environmental protection

Cite This Paper

Guo Li. Research on Plaintiff Qualifications of China's Environmental Public Interest Litigation. International Journal of Frontiers in Sociology (2024), Vol. 6, Issue 4: 86-96. https://doi.org/10.25236/IJFS.2024.060415.

References

[1] Liu Haiou, Luo Shan (2017). A Comparative Study of Environmental Public Interest Litigation Legislation between China and the United States. Journal of Xiangtan University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 3, 34-41.

[2] Qi Shujie, Zheng Xianyu (2009). The Eligibility of Parties in Environmental Litigation. Journal of Nanjing Normal University (Social Science Edition), 3, 8-45.

[3] Zhang Yu (2018). Legal Research on the Expansion of Eligible Plaintiffs in Environmental Public Interest Litigation. Journal of Social Sciences of Shanxi Higher Education, 5, 65-69.

[4] Liu Hantian, Liu Jun (2018). Legal Basis and Path Selection of Citizen Environmental Public Interest Litigation Subject Qualification. Jianghai Academic Journal, 3, 213-218.

[5] Sun Haitao, Zhang Zhixiang (2020). On the Expansion and Suppression of Plaintiff Qualification in Environmental Public Interest Litigation in China. Journal of Hohai University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 4, 97-104.

[6] Gong Gu (2017). Limitations on Environmental Citizen Litigation in the United States and Their Implications. Legal and Commercial Research, 5, 171-182.

[7] Xie Wei (2013). Development and Inspiration of German Environmental Group Litigation System. Legal Review, 2, 110-115.

[8] Chen Feng, Wu Di (2021). Improvement of Plaintiff Qualification System in Environmental Public Interest Litigation in China. Journal of Hubei University of Economics, 1, 119-125.

[9] Sun Hongkun (2017). Critiqu e and Reconstruction of the Legislative Model of Environmental Public Interest Litigation. Oriental Law, 1, 61-78. 

[10] Mei Hong, Li Haomei (2010). On the Plaintiff's Qualification in Environmental Public Interest Litigation Filed by the People's Procuratorate. Journal of Ocean University of China (Social Sciences Edition), 6, 49-52.

[11] Li Lin (2020). On the Plaintiff's Qualification and Reordering of Environmental Civil Public Interest Litigation. Political and Legal Forum, 1, 162-169.