Welcome to Francis Academic Press

International Journal of Frontiers in Sociology, 2024, 6(6); doi: 10.25236/IJFS.2024.060601.

Optimization and improvement of the compulsory transfer system of registered trademarks -- Comments on the relevant provisions of the Revised Draft of the Trademark Law (Draft for Comment)

Author(s)

Yu Xiaotian

Corresponding Author:
Yu Xiaotian
Affiliation(s)

Law School, China Jiliang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China

Abstract

In order to effectively deal with and control malicious trademark squatting, China's Trademark Law of the People's Republic of China (draft for Comments) introduced the compulsory trademark transfer system, and made comprehensive provisions on the scope of application, procedure norms and review conditions of the system. The system of compulsory trademark transfer gives the squatting person the right to request the national intellectual property administrative department to transfer the registered trademark to him. The system is more direct in protecting the legitimate rights and interests of the prior right holder and dealing with the problem of malicious trademark squatting, and can effectively improve the fairness and efficiency of trademark management. The above provisions provide a basic legal framework for the compulsory trademark transfer system, but on the whole, its standard design is still slightly rough. We should further clarify the independence of the compulsory transfer system, reasonably set the time limit of the forced transfer, and extensively cover the various possible scenarios of malicious squatting, so as to improve the practical application effect of the system and better serve the modernization process of the trademark rule of law in China.

Keywords

Trademark Law, Malicious Squatting, Forced Transfer System, Trademark Management

Cite This Paper

Yu Xiaotian. Optimization and improvement of the compulsory transfer system of registered trademarks -- Comments on the relevant provisions of the Revised Draft of the Trademark Law (Draft for Comment). International Journal of Frontiers in Sociology (2024), Vol. 6, Issue 6: 1-8. https://doi.org/10.25236/IJFS.2024.060601.

References

[1] Feng Xiaoqing. Study on the principle of benefit balance of trademark Law [J]. Changbai Academic Journal, 2007 (5): 62-66.

[2] Ning Lizhi, Ye Ziwei. Study on the application of malicious trademark squatting law [J]. Legal Review, 2022 (2): 181-196.

[3] Qin Linhang. Research on improving the acquisition of trademark registration system in China [J]. Science and Technology Entrepreneurship Monthly, 2023,36 (12): 109-113.

[4] Wang Taiping, Huang Shuying. Intervention right system in EU trademark law and its reference significance [J]. Zhonghua Trademark, 2021, (05): 53-56.

[5] Jiang Minsong. Analysis on the legal regulation of malicious trademark squatting in China [J]. Jiangxi Social Science, 2023,43 (12): 134-141.

[6] Zhang Hui. Understanding and Application of the Supreme People's Court on Several Issues Concerning the Application of Law in the Trial of Civil Dispute Cases involving Computer Network Domain Name [J]. Electronic Intellectual Property Rights, 2001 (11): 43-45.

[7] Zheng Minyu. The protection system of unregistered trademarks in Germany and its enlightenment to China [J]. Electronic Intellectual Property Rights, 2020, (07): 48-59.

[8] Zhang Haoran. On the construction of the compulsory transfer system of registered trademarks [J]. Zhonghua Trademark, 2022 (9): 54.

[9] Yang Jing. Restrictions on the exclusive right to use a registered trademark by a civil judgment [J]. People's Justice, 2019 (34): 94-98.