The cooperation between China and ASEAN (the Association of Southeast Asian Nations) countries in education is constantly deepening, and the management of intellectual property rights has become an important component of university teaching and research work. This article used qualitative and quantitative research methods to collect data through in-depth interviews, questionnaire surveys, and other methods. Based on case studies, it explored the problems and opportunities currently faced by Chinese and ASEAN universities in intellectual property management. On this basis, an in-depth exploration was conducted on the common issues in intellectual property management among universities in various countries, and corresponding governance strategies were adopted for different situations in each country. In terms of satisfaction rating, Philippine universities ranked first with a highest score of 9.5, complemented by their extremely short resolution time, demonstrating high recognition in dispute resolution. It is hoped that through this research, the theoretical basis for building a more just and efficient intellectual property protection system can be provided, promoting exchanges and cooperation between China and ASEAN countries in higher education.

Xiaomo Yu. Intellectual Property Management in Universities for Building a China ASEAN Education Community. International Journal of Frontiers in Sociology (2024), Vol. 6, Issue 6: 86-93. https://doi.org/10.25236/IJFS.2024.060614.

[1] He Jun. Construction of Intellectual Property Management System in Universities from the Perspective of Innovation Driven Development Strategy [J]. Technology Entrepreneurship Monthly, 2020, 33 (1): 79-80.

[2] Li Hui. Strategy and Implementation Path for the Construction of Intellectual Property Management System in Vocational Colleges [J]. Journal of Chuzhou Vocational and Technical College, 2020, 19 (2): 14-17.

[3] Liu Xiuwen, Li Feng. The overall framework and application implementation of intellectual property information services in universities: A case study of Peking University Library [J]. Library and Information Work, 2020, 64 (16): 22-28.

[4] Ran Congjing, Song Kai, He Mengting, et al. Construction of a university intellectual property information service platform under the intellectual property ecosystem [J]. Library Forum, 2020, 40 (3): 63-72.

[5] Chen Yihua, Zeng Qingqing, Lu Yuan. Research on the Innovative Development and Construction of Intellectual Property in Universities under the New Situation - Taking the School of Information Science, Xinhua College, Sun Yat sen University as an Example [J]. Value Engineering, 2021, 40 (10): 94-95.

[6] Wang Liping. Research on the Construction of a User Centered University Intellectual Property Information Service System [J]. Library and Information Research, 2020, 13 (3): 16-21.

[7] Stepanova A, Novikova I, Zhylinska O, et al. Assessment Methods of Intellectual Product in Research Universities. Marketing and Management of Innovations[J].Marketing and Management of Innovations, 2020, 3(3):32-44.

[8] Nizah M A M. University-led Intellectual Property Commercialization: Cases of Malaysian Universities[J].International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 2020, 24(1):774-778.

[9] Betancourt A A, Bonadio E, Mcdonagh L .Social Innovation and University Intellectual Property: Insights from the UK and Mexico[J].European intellectual property review, 2020, 42(5):293-304.

[10] Jian Y .Analysis on Intellectual Property Management of Construction Enterprises[J].World Architecture (Hundred Views), 2021, 005(005):P.22-27.

[11] Abduh R, Fajaruddin F. Intellectual property rights protection function in resolving copyright disputes[J]. International Journal Reglement & Society (Ijrs), 2021, 2(3): 170-178.