The case study method, originally developed for legal research and university teaching, was designed to enhance educational experiences and bridge the gap between academic theory and industry practice. Since Thomas Kuhn's influential work, scholars in the field of philosophy of science have begun incorporating historical events into philosophical discussions, extending their inquiries to include history and sociology. This approach facilitates a deeper understanding of the complexities of science and its real-world implications. Although the case study method faces challenges related to the universality of its theoretical applications, it offers significant advantages by aligning closely with practical realities. This method enables a move beyond the confines of logical positivism and abstract philosophical doctrines, engaging directly with real-world issues and providing flexible, realistic, and enlightening insights. Furthermore, as the scope of philosophy of science expands and its interdisciplinary interactions deepen, the case study approach fosters collaboration across sociology, history, and philosophy, promoting mutual development across these disciplines.

Lingxi Liu. Introspection of Case Studies: Toward an Interdisciplinary Philosophy of Science. Academic Journal of Humanities & Social Sciences (2024) Vol. 7, Issue 10: 69-74. https://doi.org/10.25236/AJHSS.2024.071013.

[1] Ankersmit, F. R. (1986). The Dilemma of Contemporary Anglo-Saxon Philosophy of History. In F. R. Ankersmit (Ed.), History and Theory 25 Knowing and Telling History: The Anglo-Saxon Debate. (1-27). Middlebury CT: Wesleyan University Press.

[2] Burian, R. M. (2001). The Dilemma of Case Studies Resolved: The Virtues of Using Case Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science. Perspectives on science, 9(4), 383-404

[3] Giere, R. N. (1973). History and philosophy of science: intimate relationship or marriage of convenience? The British journal for the philosophy of science, 24(3), 282-297

[4] Hacking, I. (2012). "Language, Truth and Reason" 30 years later. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 43(4), 599-609

[5] Jiang, Y.,& Ding, Q. (2018). A Review of Case Teaching Mode Research. Shanghai Pack(02), 61-62. 

[6] Kuhn, T. (1970). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

[7] Li, P. (2007). Philosophical Criticism of Case Analysis Method. Paper presented at the 2007 Academic Frontier Foru, Beijing from https://kns.cnki.net/kcms2/article/abstract? v=w1Je9LIFm 5C55SF4YWHzkQK6BR8uxJWh8R7eU0aTHPBXq-nVS2UtrVcHchBrPbjrRfLVASf9lxdXnRPyR0FMTQPLQT75KzJhWRIKX3MCChvF_rX7OOGseuEbFgJk-xo3SBIqDu9m1LpOKudBg7i5bQ==&uniplatform=NZKPT&language=CHS

[8] Murphey, M. G. (1986). Explanation, Causes, and Covering Laws. In F. R. Ankersmit (Ed.), History and Theory 25: Knowing and Telling History: The Anglo-Saxon Debate. (43-57). Middlebury CT: Wesleyan University Press.

[9] Pinnick, C., & Gale, G. (2000). Philosophy of Science and History of Science: A Troubling Interaction. Journal for general philosophy of science, 31(1), 109-125.

[10] Pitt, J. C. (2001). The Dilemma of Case Studies: Toward a Heraclitian Philosophy of Science. Perspectives on science, 9(4), 373-382.

[11] Xuan, T. (2010). Introspection on Case Analysis by Philosophy of Science. Master of Philosophy, Dongbei University of Finance and Economics, Da Lian. Retrieved from https://kns.cnki.net/kcms2/ article/abstract?v=w1Je9LIFm5CQrlZ2_7YEqfcIT1Dqglf_3twXmCKzFCLA_TBn9ein7kY3F3fePVbeCtuBKZkXS0Sfsqa2jgkSJv3MAh9SvnVNPsUHFnP6XL3-BSe6n-IK3Qls7zdRgt4Q21M1i90h8lLmDiWSBkxtNA==&uniplatform=NZKPT&language=CHS Available from

[12] You,Y., & Chen, C. (2023). The philosophical foundation and analytical path of case oriented research. Social Sciences Digest (12), 12-14

[13] Yuan, J., & Tong, Y. (2021). Synchronic Analysis or Diachronic Analysis—Reflections on the Historical Philosophy of Science. Studies in Philosophy of Science and Technology, 38(02), 20-26