International Journal of Frontiers in Sociology, 2025, 7(6); doi: 10.25236/IJFS.2025.070606.
Wenye Lyu
School of Law, China Jiliang University, Hangzhou, China
Both China's Criminal Procedure Law and the Provisions of the People's Procuratorates on Criminal Procedure explicitly stipulate the review of the necessity of detention, and the Procuratorial Work Development Plan for the 14th Five-Year Plan Period (2021) reaffirms the significance of the post-arrest detention review system. From the perspective of detention data, this system has reduced China’s detention rate to a certain extent, yet the rate remains relatively high. As a system balancing public interests and individual rights, the various problems emerging in practice indicate that there is room for optimization in China's efforts to review the necessity of detention. To implement the concept of "less arrest and cautious detention" and effectively lower the detention rate, it is essential to re-examine the inherent meaning of "necessity of detention." In the practice of reviewing the necessity of detention, the ambiguity of review standards also restricts its in-depth development. Therefore, we should start from existing problems and put forward corresponding suggestions for establishing a more comprehensive review standard, aiming to activate the system's vitality and ensure the stable and effective implementation of the "less arrest and cautious detention" policy.
Less Arrest and Cautious Detention; Arrest; Necessity of Detention; Social Danger; Review Standards
Wenye Lyu. Research on the Standards for Reviewing the Necessity of Detention. International Journal of Frontiers in Sociology (2025), Vol. 7, Issue 6: 34-39. https://doi.org/10.25236/IJFS.2025.070606.
[1] Wang Lusheng. On the Symbolic Legislation of Criminal Procedure and Its Consequences: A Natural Language Mining Based on Big Data of 3.03 Million Judgments[J]. Tsinghua Law Review, 2018,12(06):124-147.
[2] Chen Hao. Review of the Necessity of Detention: From “Framework Construction” to “Graded Balance”[J]. Northern Legal Science, 2018,12(02):112-123.
[3] Qin Ce. Predictive Proof: A New Type of Litigation Proof—Centered on the Assessment of Personal Danger[J]. Jinling Law Review, 2014,(01):12-18.
[4] Liu Jihua. The Chinese Model of Arrest Review System and Its Reform[J]. Chinese Journal of Law, 2012,34(02):122-142.
[5] Gao Tong. A Study on the Social Danger Condition for Arrest in Minor Crime Cases—Taking the Crime of Intentional Injury as an Example[J]. Tsinghua Law Journal, 2021,39(02):73-89.
[6] Yang Xiong. Reflection on the Substantive Tendency of Criminal Compulsory Measures—Taking Preventive Detention as an Example[J]. Tsinghua Law Journal, 2008,(04):147-152.
[7] Yang Xiuli, Guan Zhenhai. The Construction of the Evaluation Model for Social Danger in Arrest Conditions[J]. Chinese Criminal Science, 2014,(01):63-70.
[8] Yao Li, Shao Shao. On the Review of the Necessity of Post-Arrest Detention—Starting from Article 93 of the New Criminal Procedure Law[J]. Science of Law (Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law), 2013,31(05):151-158.
[9] Long Zongzhi. A Study on the Internal Institutions and Functional Settings of Procuratorial Organs[J]. Jurists Review, 2018,(01):141-151.
[10] Ma Minghui, He Xiangdong. Deduction, Induction, and Abduction—From the Perspective of Information Philosophy[J]. Studies in Philosophy of Science and Technology, 2014,31(03):12-21.
[11] Liu Chaoyang. A Genealogical Analysis of Lombroso’s Study on Personal Danger[J]. Political Science and Law, 2004,(03):82-87.
[12] Wang Zhenghui. The Principle and Construction of the Quantitative Model for Evaluating Social Danger in Arrest Review[J]. Tsinghua Law Journal, 2016,34(02):70-80.
[13] Lao Jiaqi. An Empirical Study on the Application of Strict Sentencing for Recidivists[J]. China Legal Science, 2016,(01):247-268.
[14] He Bangwu. Review of the Necessity of Detention: Problems and Solutions—An Analysis Based on the Provisions of the People’s Procuratorates on Handling Cases of Reviewing the Necessity of Detention (for Trial Implementation)[J]. Journal of Gansu University of Political Science and Law, 2021,(02):57-69.
[15] Sun Changyong. The Legal Control and Judicial Review of Compulsory Investigation[J]. Modern Law Science, 2005,(05):72-81.
[16] Long Zongzhi. The Improvement of the Judicial Review System for Compulsory Investigation[J]. China Legal Science, 2011,(06):43-50.