Welcome to Francis Academic Press

International Journal of New Developments in Engineering and Society, 2020, 4(4); doi: 10.25236/IJNDES.040411.

Research Idea and Literature Review on the Effect of Affective Forecasting on Emotional Experience

Author(s)

Sophie Liu

Corresponding Author:
Sophie Liu
Affiliation(s)

Waterloo Collegiate Institute, Waterloo, N2L3P2, Canada

Abstract

According to the study by Timothy Wilson and Daniel Gilbert on affective forecasting (2003), people’s prediction of their emotional reactions towards future events could influence their actual emotional responses. The aim of this research idea is to further investigate the impact of affective forecasting on the intensity of affective experience by conducting two experiments in which participants would be divided into two groups based on their predictions of the intensity of their emotional experience towards a fear-inducing event and a happiness-inducing event, and the intensity of the actual emotional experience of the two groups would be recorded and compared. Several related studies on affective forecasting are reviewed in the introduction section.

Keywords

Affective Forecasting, Affective Experience, Expectation Effect, Literature Review, Research Proposal

Cite This Paper

Sophie Liu. Research Idea and Literature Review on the Effect of Affective Forecasting on Emotional Experience. International Journal of New Developments in Engineering and Society (2020) Vol.4, Issue 4: 123-132. https://doi.org/10.25236/IJNDES.040411.

References

[1] Wilson, T. D., & Gilbert, D. T. (2003). Affective forecasting. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, Vol. 35 (p. 345–411). Elsevier Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(03)01006-2
[2] Kahneman, D., & Snell, J. (1990). Predicting utility. In R. M. Hogarth (Ed.), Insights in decision making: A tribute to Hillel J. Einhorn (p. 295–310). University of Chicago Press. Retrieved from PsycINFO
[3] Wilson, T. D., Wheatley, T., Meyers, J. M., Gilbert, D. T., & Axsom, D. (2000). Focalism: A source of durability bias in affective forecasting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(5), 821–836. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.78.5.821
[4] Griffin, D. W., Dunning, D., & Ross, L. (1990). The role of construal processes in overconfident predictions about the self and others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(6), 1128–1139. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.59.6.1128
[5] Woodzicka, Julie A.; Marianne LaFrance (Spring 2001). "Real Versus Imagined Gender Harassment". Journal of Social Issues. 57 (1): 15–30. doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00199
[6] Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). On the interpretation of intuitive probability: A reply to Jonathan Cohen. Cognition, 7(4), 409–411. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(79)90024-6
[7] Robinson, M. D., & Clore, G. L. (2002). Episodic and semantic knowledge in emotional self-report: Evidence for two judgment processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(1), 198–215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.83.1.198
[8] Frederick, Shane; Loewenstein, George; O'Donoghue, Ted (2011). "Time Discounting and Time Preference: A Critical Review". In Camerer, Colin F.; Loewenstein, George; Rabin, Matthew (eds.). Advances in Behavioral Economics. Princeton University Press. pp. 187–188. ISBN 978-1400829118.
[9] Quoidbach, Jordi; Dunn, Elizabeth (2010). "Personality neglect: The unforeseen impact of personal dispositions on emotional life". Psychological Science. 21 (12): 1783–6. doi:10.1177/0956797610388816
[10] Klaaren, K. J., Hodges, S. D., & Wilson, T. D. (1994). The role of affective expectations in subjective experience and decision-making. Social Cognition, 12(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.1994.12.2.77
[11] Wasko, Laurie E.; Pury, Cynthia L. S. (2009). "Affective Forecasting". In Lopez, Shane J. (ed.). The Encyclopedia of Positive Psychology. West Sussex: Blackwell Publishing. p. 24. doi:10.1111/b.9781405161251.2009.x
[12] Hausman, Daniel M. (2010). "Hedonism and Welfare Economics". Economics and Philosophy. 26 (3): 321–344. doi:10.1017/S026626711000039