International Journal of Frontiers in Sociology, 2022, 4(10); doi: 10.25236/IJFS.2022.041006.
Ma Yuzheng
Anhui University of Finance and Economics, Bengbu, Anhui, 233000, China
The system of incidental review of normative documents based on Articles 53 and 64 of the Administrative Procedure Law of the People's Republic of China is characterized as "cautious" and "poorly run". The real-life dilemma faced by the specific embodiment of is following: the content of the review is limited to "the provisions of the administrative act sued"; containing "joint party and government documents" attribute of the normative documents are often avoided review; review results are weak, the court is difficult to "put forward proposals to deal with". In this regard, the court should adhere to the basic principle of "comprehensive review"; in the face of joint party and government issuance, the party committee should take the lead in clarifying the criteria for joint issuance and reducing unnecessary joint normative documents; when dealing with the review results, a combination of incidental review and record review mechanism can be established to ensure that the court's recommendation function is effectively implemented.
Incidental Review, Administrative Litigation, Normative Document
Ma Yuzheng. On the Dilemma for the Mechanism about Incidental Review of Normative Documents and Solution. International Journal of Frontiers in Sociology (2022), Vol. 4, Issue 10: 26-30. https://doi.org/10.25236/IJFS.2022.041006.
[1] Xin Chunying, Interpretation of the Administrative Procedure Law of the People's Republic of China [M]. Law Press Publishing House of law, 2014.
[2] Huang Xuexian. Review of Administrative Normative Documents in Administrative Litigation [J]. Nanjing Social Sciences, 2019, (05).
[3] Hu Jinguang, Some issues on perfecting the Constitutionality Review mechanism in China [J]. People's Tribune, 2019, (31).
[4] The Administrative Division of the Supreme People's Court, Understanding and Application of Judicial Interpretation of Administrative Litigation [M]. People's Court Press, 2018.
[5] Huang Xuexian. The rule evolution and perfection of judicial review of administrative normative documents [J]. Journal of Suzhou university (philosophy and social sciences), 2017, 38(02).
[6] Zhai Guoqiang, The dual functions of the constitutionality review system in China [J]. Law Science Magazine, 2021, 42(05).
[7] Feng Lixia, System and capacity: the dilemma and way out of the filing review system [J]. Political Science and Law, 2018, 12.