Welcome to Francis Academic Press

The Frontiers of Society, Science and Technology, 2023, 5(5); doi: 10.25236/FSST.2023.050511.

The Relationship between Cultural Institutions, Cultural Identity and Ideology in Chinese Museums: a Discourse Analysis

Author(s)

Haoyang Zhang, Xiaotong Wei

Corresponding Author:
Haoyang Zhang
Affiliation(s)

University Sains Malaysia, Gelugor, 11800, Malaysia

Abstract

This study examines the relationship between cultural institutions, Cultural identity, and ideology in Chinese museums through a discourse analysis. The Palace Museum, the Beijing Urban Planning Exhibition Hall, and the Xinjiang Regional Museum are used as case studies. The research methods employed include discourse analysis, content analysis, critical discourse analysis, in-depth interviews and a field survey. The results of this study show that these museums present narratives that construct a Cultural identity rooted in the past, but also forward-looking and modern. These narratives are closely tied to the ideology of the Chinese and are used to promote a sense of unity and continuity among the Chinese people. However, there are also contradictions and limitations in the construction of Cultural identity through these cultural institutions.

Keywords

Cultural institutions, Cultural identity, Ideology, Discourse analysis, Chinese museums

Cite This Paper

Haoyang Zhang, Xiaotong Wei. The Relationship between Cultural Institutions, Cultural Identity and Ideology in Chinese Museums: a Discourse Analysis. The Frontiers of Society, Science and Technology (2023) Vol. 5, Issue 5: 69-73. https://doi.org/10.25236/FSST.2023.050511.

References

[1] Claypool L. Zhang Jian and China's first museum [J]. The Journal of Asian Studies, 2005, 64(3): 567-604.

[2] Naquin S. The Forbidden City Goes Abroad: Qing History and the Foreign Exhibitions of the Palace Museum, 1974–2004[J]. T'oung Pao, 2004, 90(4): 341-397.

[3] Yan Yuanjian. Research on the Display Design of Urban Planning Museum in China[D]. Nanjing Arts Institute, 2016.

[4] Singh K. The Museum is National[J]. India International Centre Quarterly, 2002, 29(3/4): 176-196; 

[5] Macdonald S J. Museums, national, post national and transcultural identities[J]. Museum studies: An anthology of contexts, 2012: 273-286.

[6] Ambrose T, Paine C. Museum basics: the international handbook[M]. Routledge, 2006.

[7] Hung C. The red line: Creating a museum of the Chinese revolution[J]. The China Quarterly, 2005, 184: 914-933.

[8] Nitzky W. Mediating heritage preservation and rural development: Ecomuseum development in China [J]. Urban Anthropology and Studies of Cultural Systems and World Economic Development, 2012: 367-417.

[9] Anderson B. Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism[M]//The new social theory reader. Routledge, 2020: 282-288.

[10] Bennett T. The birth of the museum: History, theory, politics[M]. Routledge, 2013.