Welcome to Francis Academic Press

International Journal of Frontiers in Sociology, 2023, 5(4); doi: 10.25236/IJFS.2023.050418.

Discussing Data Ownership Disputes and Data Protection from Data Crawling Practices

Author(s)

Zhaohui Yang

Corresponding Author:
Zhaohui Yang
Affiliation(s)

China Jiliang University, Hangzhou, China

Abstract

As a new kind of oil, data is an important resource that enterprises compete for in the digital economy, and mastering data means mastering the market. However, the game of endless crawlers and anti-crawler technologies reflects the conflicting relationship between data crawling and resource protection. In China's judicial practice, the general provisions of Article 2 of the Anti-Unfair Competition Law are usually applied to the regulation of data crawling. The application of this provision should find a balance between the protection of data resources and the restriction of data monopoly, so as to resolve the conflict between data grabbers and data collectors, data sharing and the protection of data rights and interests; it also needs to be discussed in terms of the competitive relationship, the legitimacy of the act and whether the principle of necessary facilities can be defended. As the cornerstone of the legitimacy of data capture, we should discuss how to protect data and maximize its value by building a system of data rights attribution, so as to alleviate the inherent tension between incentivizing data production and reducing the risk of individual privacy infringement, form a reasonable division between individual users, platform enterprises and the government and the state regarding the content and boundaries of data ownership, and build a "common ground" between the public, online platforms and the government and the state in data governance. This will lead to the establishment of a "co-construction, co-management and sharing" pattern of government national data governance.

Keywords

anti-unfair competition law; crawlers; data corroboration; legitimacy

Cite This Paper

Zhaohui Yang. Discussing Data Ownership Disputes and Data Protection from Data Crawling Practices. International Journal of Frontiers in Sociology (2023), Vol. 5, Issue 4: 125-134. https://doi.org/10.25236/IJFS.2023.050418.

References

[1] Big Data: What Is Web Scraping and How to Use It, Towards Data Sci [EB/OL]. (2018-02-02) [2021-07-08].https://towardsdatascience.com/big-data-what-is-web-scraping-and-how-to-use-it-74e7e8b58fd6.

[2] Su Qing. The Evolution of Web Crawlers and Their Legitimacy Limits [J]. Comparative Law Research, 2021(3):89-104.(In Chinese)

[3] Javed M. Ho Do Internet Search Engines Work? Scientific American [EB/OL]. (2004-11-29) [2021-07-09].https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/how-do-internet-search-en/.

[4] Su Qing. The Evolution of Web Crawlers and Their Legitimacy Limitations [J]. Comparative Law Research, 2021(3):89-104.(In Chinese)

[5] Liu Jifeng, Zhang Ya. Determination of the illegality of data grabbing from the perspective of the Anti-Unfair Competition Law [J]. Journal of Northwestern Polytechnical University (Social Science Edition), 2021(04):102-111.(In Chinese)

[6] Wang Jian, Wu Zongze. On Data as a Necessary Facility in Anti-Monopoly Law [J]. Law Research, 2021(2): 102.(In Chinese)

[7] Peng Hui. The Logical Structure and Empowerment Boundary of Data Ownership——Based on the Perspective of "Tragedy of the Commons" and "Tragedy of Anti-Commons" [J]. Comparative Law Research, 2022.(In Chinese)

[8] Mei Xiaying, Luo Ying. The Legal Attributes of Data and Their Civil Law Positioning (English) [J]. Social Sciences in China, 2019, 1.(In Chinese)

[9] Zhang Jinping. The Evolution of EU Personal Data Rights and Its Enlightenment [J]. Law and Business Research, 2019, 5.(In Chinese)

[10] Long Weiqiu. Research on the construction and system of new data property rights [J]. Tribune of Political Science and Law, 2017, 35(4).(In Chinese)

[11] Yan Xiaoli. Reform and Enlightenment of EU Data Protection System [J]. Cyberspace Security, 2017 (2): 22-26.(In Chinese)

[12] Cheng Xiao. Personal Information Protection from the Perspective of Civil Code Compilation [J]. Chinese Law, 2019, 4: 26-43.(In Chinese)

[13] Ding Xiaodong. Who does the data belong to? [J]. Platform data ownership and data protection from the perspective of web crawlers, 2019, 22(205): 69-83.(In Chinese)

[14] Wang Xixin. National Protection Obligation and Development of Personal Information [J]. Chinese Law, 2021(In Chinese)

[15] OECD. Enhancing Access to and Sharing of Data--ReconcilingRisks and Benefits for Data Reuse across Societies [EB/OL]. (2019-11-26) [2021-07-08]. https://www.oecd.org/ going- digital/ enhancing-access-to-and-sharing-of-data.pdf.

[16] Zhou Hanhua. Exploring the way of incentive-compatible personal data governance - the legislative direction of China's personal information protection law [J]. Legal Research, 2018, 40(2): 3-23.(In Chinese)

[17] Mei Xiaying. The Limitation of Private Law and the Construction of Public Order in Data Protection between Sharing and Control [J]. Chinese and Foreign Law, 2019, 31(4): 845-870.(In Chinese)