Welcome to Francis Academic Press
Login | Register

International Journal of Frontiers in Sociology, 2023, 5(5); doi: 10.25236/IJFS.2023.050511.

Analysis on ChatGPT Technology Ethics Governance

Author(s)

Jiyuan Li

Corresponding Author:
Jiyuan Li
Affiliation(s)

School of Marxism, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing, China

Abstract

Recently, ChatGPT, a popular "new species", has subverted the relationship between humans and technology, and its "autonomous learning" characteristic has caused various concerns among scholars. While the development of artificial intelligence brings convenience to humans, it also faces technological and ethical issues caused by technological uncertainty. Therefore, in order to fully utilize the advantages brought by ChatGPT and prevent the risks it may cause, this article concludes with conclusions and recommendations through research.

Keywords

Artificial intelligence; Science and technology ethics; Risk; Supervision; ChatGPT

Cite This Paper

Jiyuan Li. Analysis on ChatGPT Technology Ethics Governance. International Journal of Frontiers in Sociology (2023), Vol. 5, Issue 5: 74-77. https://doi.org/10.25236/IJFS.2023.050511.

References

[1] Acemoglu D.,D. Autor. Skills,tasks and tech—nologie8: Implications for employment and eamings[J]. Handbook of labor economics, 2011,4: 1043–1171.

[2] Acemoglu D., & Restrepo P. (2020). Robots and jobs: Evidence from US labor markets. Journal of Political Economy, 128(6), 2188-2244.

[3] Autor D.H., Levy F. and Murnane R.J. (2003) The Skill Content of Recent Technological Change: An Empirical Investigation. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118, 1279-1333.

[4] Ajay Agrawal, Joshua Gans, Avi Goldfarb. ChatGPT and How AI Disrupts Industries[J]. Harvard Business Review, 2022.

[5] Diseases T.L.I. The COVID-19 infodemic[J]. The Lancet Infectious Diseases, 2020. 20(8).

[6] Else H. Abstracts written by ChatGPT fool scientists.[J]. Nature, 2023, 613(7944): 423.

[7] Frey C B, Osborne M A. The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerisation?[J]. Technological forecasting and social change, 2017, 114: 254-280.

[8] FumagalliE, RezaeiS, Salomons A(2022). OK computer: Worker perceptions of algorithmic recruitment.Research Policy. 51-2:1004420.

[9] Gordijn B, Have H t. ChatGPT: evolution or revolution?[J]. Med Health Care and Philos,2023. 

[10] Thorp H H. ChatGPT is fun, but not an author[J]. Science, 2023, 379(6630): 313-313.

[11] Li Y, Choi D, Chung J, et al. Competition-level code generation with alphacode[J]. Science, 2022, 378(6624): 1092-1097.

[12] Pellegrino J W. A learning sciences perspective on the design and use of assessment in education[J]. 2014.

[13] Rudin C. Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead[J]. Nature Machine Intelligence,2019,1(5): 206-215.

[14] Stokel-Walker C. ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove.[J]. Nature, 2023, 613(7945): 620-621.

[15] Stokel-Walker C, VanNoorden R. What ChatGPT and generative AI mean for science.[J]. Nature, 2023, 614(7947): 214-216.

[16] Van Dis E A M,BollenJ,ZuidemaW,vanRooijR,Bockting C L. ChatGPT: five priorities for research. [J]. Nature, 2023, 614(7947): 224-226.