Welcome to Francis Academic Press

Academic Journal of Business & Management, 2023, 5(9); doi: 10.25236/AJBM.2023.050916.

DAM: An Agent for Change in Organization to Cope with Disruptive Technology, Shifting Consumer Needs and Expectations

Author(s)

Chang Qin

Corresponding Author:
Chang Qin
Affiliation(s)

Faulty of Arts and Humanities, King's College London, London, WC2R 2LS, UK

Abstract

This paper emphasizes that DAM would help organizations respond to external changes in a dynamic environment and would promote internal changes in the organization. Firstly, from the organization's response to external changes, I would analyze the success and failure cases of organizations using a series of incremental and radical innovations to respond to changes in the external environment. And I would put forward the point of view that organizations need DAM to participate in change management in the context of the dynamic digital world. Secondly, in terms of internal changes in the organization, I would explain how DAM helps companies introduce technology, rethink business models, develop new workflows and processes, adjust structural changes and organizational culture, and promote better organization development. Finally, the focus of the discussion part is that for organizations that use DAM, although DAM may have agent power, the importance of individual agent power to the organization could not be ignored. At the same time, organizations also need to pay attention to the impact of identity, organizational identity, technological transformation, and the costs and risks the organization has to bear when introducing DAM strategies or departments.

Keywords

Digital Asset Management, Digital Disruption, Radical Innovation

Cite This Paper

Chang Qin. DAM: An Agent for Change in Organization to Cope with Disruptive Technology, Shifting Consumer Needs and Expectations. Academic Journal of Business & Management (2023) Vol. 5, Issue 9: 103-109. https://doi.org/10.25236/AJBM.2023.050916.

References

[1] Todnem, R., 2005. Organisational change management: A critical review. Journal of change management, 5(4), pp.369-380.

[2] Horodyski, J., 2014. Change Management for DAM. [online] Available at:    <https://www. cmswire.com/cms/digital-asset-management/change-management-for-dam-025335.php> [Accessed 17 April 2021].

[3] Schwab K., 2017. The fourth industrial revolution. Currency.

[4] Schwab K. (2020). The fourth industrial revolution: what it means, how to respond. 2016. In World Economic Forum. Available online: https://www. weforum. org/about/the-fourth-industrial-revolution-by-klaus-schwab (accessed on 24 October 2021).

[5] Gans, J., 2016. The disruption dilemma. MIT press.

[6] Christensen, C., Raynor, M.E. and McDonald, R., 2013. Disruptive innovation. Harvard Business Review.

[7] Schumpeter, P., 2000. Creative law. LAW INSTITUTE JOURNAL, 74(2), p.32.

[8] Dosi, G., 1983. Technological paradigms and technological trajectories. Research Policy, 11(3).

[9] Zuboff, S., 2019. ‘Chapter 3: Discovery of Behavioural Surplus’ in The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power. Public Affairs, New York.

[10] Greenfield, A., 2017. Radical technologies: The design of everyday life. Verso Books.

[11] Perryman, N., 2008. Doctor Who and the Convergence of Media: A Case Study in ‘Transmedia Storytelling’. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies. [Online] 14 (1), 21–39. Available at: <http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1354856507084417> [Accessed 12 April 2021].

[12] Regli, T., 2016. Digital and marketing asset management: the real story about DAM technology and practices (Vol. 1). Rosenfeld Media.

[13] Kavanagh, B., 2018. Reimagining classical music performing organisations for the digital age'. The Classical Music Industry, Routledge, New York and London.

[14] Feenberg, A.,2011. Agency and citizenship in a technological society. Lecture presented to the Course on Digital Citizenship, IT University of Copenhagen, Denmark. Available at: <https://www. sfu.ca/~andrewf/copen5-1.pdf> [Accessed 17 April 2021].

[15] Slack, J.D. and Wise, J.M., 2007. Culture+ technology: A primer. Peter Lang.

[16] Goldstein, B., 2016. Digital asset management is not software or a system, but how to do business. Journal of Digital Media Management, 5(1), pp.6-11.

[17] McGovern, M., 2013. Digital asset management: where to start. Curator: The Museum Journal, 56(2), pp. 237-254.

[18] Monahan, N., 2018. From Digital Asset Management to Digital Transformation. [online] Available at: <https://www.brandworkz.com/digital-asset-management/dam-transformation/> [Accessed 17 April 2021].

[19] Lucas Jr, H.C. and Goh, J.M., 2009. Disruptive technology: How Kodak missed the digital photography revolution. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 18(1), pp.46-55.

[20] Tripsas, M., 2009. Technology, identity, and inertia through the lens of “The Digital Photography Company”. Organization science, 20(2), pp. 441-460.

[21] Brown, D. and Nicholas, G., 2012. Protecting indigenous cultural property in the age of digital democracy: Institutional and communal responses to Canadian First Nations and Māori heritage concerns. Journal of Material Culture, 17(3), pp.307-324.

[22] Levy, R., Short, M. and Measey, P., 2015. Agile Foundations: Principles. Practices and Frameworks, London, UK.