Academic Journal of Mathematical Sciences, 2023, 4(2); doi: 10.25236/AJMS.2023.040207.
Zefeng Liu1, Ruikai Zhu2, Yongming Chen3, Zihan Chen4, Zhuoyan Zhou5, Weijun Du6
1School of Mathematics and Statistics, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing, 210044, China
2School of Computer and Software, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing, 210044, China
3Changwang School of Honors, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing, 210044, China
4School of Mathematics and Statistics, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing, 210044, China
5Jiangsu Key Laboratory for Optoelectronic Detection of Atmosphere and Ocean, Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center on Atmospheric Environment and Equipment Technology (CICAEET), Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing, 210044, China
6Jurong Senior High School of Jiangsu Province, Zhenjiang, 212400, China
The purpose of the United Nations is to promote peaceful development in the world, which should be based on the equitable development of all countries. To evaluate global equity, this paper establishes an integrated comprehensive national conditions consistency (CNCC) model to evaluate the concept of global equity. First, to describe the concepts of input and output, this paper introduces comprehensive National conditions (CNC) and expected Comprehensive National conditions (ECNC). For CNC, this paper selects three levels of classification, selects 12 indicators closely related to CNC from four aspects, and uses the hierarchical analysis process modified by the entropy weight method to analyze the index coefficient. Subsequently, CNC and ECNC were integrated, and the concept of CNCC was introduced, which was used to describe global equity.
global equity, comprehensive evaluation model, comprehensive national conditions
Zefeng Liu, Ruikai Zhu, Yongming Chen, Zihan Chen, Zhuoyan Zhou, Weijun Du. Global national equity assessment based on comprehensive evaluation model. Academic Journal of Mathematical Sciences (2023) Vol. 4, Issue 2: 46-52. https://doi.org/10.25236/AJMS.2023.040207.
[1] Ayelet Banai, Eszter Kollar. Reading bedtime stories to compatriots: Reconciling global equality of opportunity and self-determination[J]. Review of International Studies, 2019, 45(3).
[2] Eszter Kollar. Global equality of opportunity and self-determination in the context of immigration[J]. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 2016, 20(6).
[3] Feiyang Xu. Globalization and Global income distribution: Opportunities and Challenges [J]. Journal of Dali University, 2020, 5(09):63-69.
[4] Sisi Zhou. Natural resources equality and Global Justice [D]. Wuhan University, 2018.
[5] Quan Yuan, Zeyu Liu, Shiyao Bao. Research on the Global Equlty Index Model[J]. Academic Journal of Business & Management, 2022, 4.0(4.0).
[6] Richardson Sarah S. Equality as a work in progressThe Patriarchs Angela Saini Beacon Press, 2023. 256 pp.[J]. Science (New York, N.Y.), 2023, 379(6634).
[7] Sigmund Loland. Response to commentaries on 'Caster Semenya, athlete classification, and fair equality of opportunity in sport'.[J]. Journal of medical ethics, 2020, 46(9).
[8] Zhu Z, Zhang L, Hong M , et al. Equity Investment Value Assessment Based on Corporate Earnings Information[J]. International Journal of Simulation: Systems, 2015, 16(2):4.1-4.6.
[9] Rose Luigi Delle, von Harling Benedict, Pomarol Alex. Wilson coefficients and natural zeros from the on-shell viewpoint[J]. Journal of High Energy Physics, 2022, 2022(5).