In recent years, with the development of the market economy, the number of illegal monopoly cases is increasing. The new Anti-Monopoly Law of the People's Republic of China (hereinafter referred to as the New Anti-Monopoly Law) was amended on June 24, 2022, in order to better maintain the order of the market economy, crack down on monopolistic behaviors and improve the legal system in the anti-monopoly field. Since then, the anti-monopoly civil public interest litigation system has formally entered the field of anti-monopoly law as a new system. However, the revised Law does not make detailed provisions on the civil public interest litigation system. In terms of the provisions on the subject of public interest litigation, the current law only stipulates that the procuratorial organ is the subject that can initiate public interest litigation, which makes it difficult for some cases infringing on social public interests to be well resolved through public interest litigation. Therefore, this paper will take Article 55 of the Civil Procedure Law and Article 47 of the Protection of Consumer Rights and Interests as the basis point, and briefly introduce the relevant provisions on the subject qualification of the anti-monopoly civil public interest procedure law in foreign jurisdictions. Based on this view, it is necessary for the main body of anti-monopoly public litigation to become more diversified to ensure that the main body of litigation can play substantial effect in judicial practice.At the same time, it is necessary to improve the existing procedures and improve the related supporting subjects' difficulties in providing evidence and the lack of litigation incentives , so as to provide ideas for the improvement of the subject qualification of public litigation in the field of anti-monopoly law.

Sun Xiaotao. Research on Subject Qualification of Anti-Monopoly Civil Public Interest Litigation. The Frontiers of Society, Science and Technology (2023) Vol. 5, Issue 8: 106-113. https://doi.org/10.25236/FSST.2023.050814.

[1] Wang Xianlin. On the problems of Anti-monopoly Strategy based on law -- Also on the revision and improvement of our Anti-Monopoly Law [J]. Law Review, 2019, 38 (04) : 119-129.

[2] Li Juan. Reflection and Improvement of Anti-monopoly Implementation Mechanism: A Case Study of Anti-monopoly Public Interest Litigation [J]. Collection of Essays on Economic Law, 2019 (02): 316-351.

[3] Ma Wenfeng. On the System Construction of Private Enforcement of Anti-monopoly Law [J]. Journal of Xingyi Normal University for Nationalities, 2019 (02) : 11-16.

[4] Wang Jian, Fang Xiang. Deterrence Concept and Effective Coordination of Our Anti-monopoly Sanctions [J]. Economic and Trade Law Review, 2019 (02) : 113-131.

[5] Li Bingyan. Analysis on the Legislative Improvement of the Private Enforcement System of Anti-monopoly Law [J]. Modern Commerce and Industry, 2019,40 (04) : 144-145.

[6] Chen Yunliang. Anti-monopoly Civil Public Interest Litigation: The Way of Relief for Consumers suffering from monopoly damage [J]. Modern law, 2018, 40 (5) : 130-144.

[7] Zhu Jingao. Analysis of the Concept of Civil Public Interest Litigation [J]. Law Forum, 2017,32 (03) : 123-132.

[8] Guo Zongcai. A Comparative Study of Civil Public Interest Litigation and Administrative Public Interest Litigation [J]. Chinese Public Prosecutors, 2018 (09) : 3-6.

[9] Liu Jifeng. The Construction and Application of the Analysis Method of antitrust legal Interests [J]. Chinese Journal of Law, 2013 (06) : 20-33.

[10] Yang Yuhan. Research on Anti-Monopoly Civil Public Interest Litigation System [D]. East China University of Science and Technology, 202:32-35.

[11] Li Yining. Research on Anti-Monopoly Civil Public Interest Litigation System [D]. Jilin University of Finance and Economics, 2020:26-30.

[12] Li Yu. On the Modesty of Anti-monopoly Law - From the Public Welfare Theory of Government regulation of economy [J]. Foreign Economy and Trade, 2020 (06) : 98-101.