In recent years, with the rapid development of society, the traditional local governance model can no longer meet the complex and multi-subject governance needs of modern society, and the digitization of the governance model is urgent, and the research on digital governance has come to a hot issue widely considered by scholars at home and abroad. To clearly understand the current status and future development trend of digital governance research at home and abroad, this paper uses Citespace to visually analyse the CSSCI literature in CNKI and the literature in WOS database, and summarize the development context and the latest research trends of digital governance, to provide enlightenment for the research of digital governance by domestic and foreign scholars, and then promote the development of digital governance research and practice.

Xiaozhen Zhou. Research progress on digital governance in the context of the digital economy at home and abroad—visualization analysis based on citespace. Academic Journal of Business & Management (2023) Vol. 5, Issue 12: 46-55. https://doi.org/10.25236/AJBM.2023.051207.

[1] Li Nan, Chu Jingli. Analysis of the Status of Science and Technology Intelligence Research in China in the Last 20 Years [J]. Science and Technology Intelligence Research, 2021, 3 (04): 13-31. DOI: 10.19809/j.cnki.kjqbyj. 2021.04.002 

[2] Liu Yan, Wang Zhengrong, Qian Kun. The Evolution and Emerging Trends of Green Supply Chain Research in China: CiteSpace Visualization Analysis Based on CSSCI Literature [J]. Science and Technology Management Research, 2019,39 (21): 200-207

[3] Florida L. Soft ethics, the government of the digital and the General Data Protection Regulation [J]. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 2018, 376 (2133): 20180081 

[4] Huang K, Madnick S, Choucri N, et al. A systematic framework to understand transitional governance for cybersecurity risks from digital trade [J]. Global Policy, 2021, 12 (5): 625-638

[5] Magnusson J, Koutsikouri D, P ä iv ä rinta T. Efficiency creep and shadow innovation: activating ambidextrous IT Governance in the public sector [J]. European Journal of Information Systems, 2020, 29 (4): 329-349 

[6] Ren Baoping, Li Jingyu. Constraints and Implementation Paths for the Modernization of China's Digital Economy Governance System [J]. Learning and Practice, 2023 (02): 24-33+2. DOI: 10. 19624/ j. cnki.cn42-1005/c. 2023.02.008

[7] Hu Weiwei, Lu Yuening. Research on the Generation Mechanism and Operational Logic of a Digital Rural Governance Community: An Empirical Study Based on the Construction of the "First Village in China's Greenhouse" Digital Village [J]. Journal of Public Management, 2023, 20 (01): 133-143+175. DOI: 10.16149/j.cnki.23-1523.20221018.001 

[8] Kuang Aiping, Wang Mingfeng, Zhang Yinghao. Research progress and prospects of the digital reshaping of global local interaction [J]. Progress in Geographic Science, 2023,42 (02): 380-391 

[9] Liu Yan, Wang Zhengrong, Qian Kun. The Evolution and Emerging Trends of Green Supply Chain Research in China: CiteSpace Visualization Analysis Based on CSSCI Literature [J]. Science and Technology Management Research, 2019,39 (21): 200-207

[10] Sarker M N I, Wu M, Hossin M A. Smart governance through big data: Digital transformation of public agencies [C] //2018 International conference on artistic intelligence and big data (ICAIBD) IEEE, 2018: 62-70 

[11] Lee C H, Wang D, Liu S, et al. A digital transformation enabled framework and strategies for public health risk response and governance: China's experience [J]. Industrial Management&Data Systems, 2022 (ahead of print)

[12] Struijk M, Angelopoulos S, Ou C X J, et al. Navigating digital transformation through an information quality strategy: Evidence from a military organization [J]. Information Systems Journal, 2023 

[13] Zhao Xiaofeng, Liu Haiying. Digital Rural Governance: Theoretical Traceability, Development Opportunities, and Unexpected Consequences [J]. Academic Journal, 2022 (07): 125-133 

[14] Wu Jiafeng. Networking Reconstruction of Rural Governance Community and Digital Transformation of Rural Governance [J]. Jiangsu Social Sciences, 2022 (03): 81-89. DOI: 10. 13858/ j. cnki. cn32-1312/c. 2022. 0517.010

[15] Wu Ruijia, Zhang Le. Decomposing and reshaping: community awareness in grassroots governance Digital transformation [J]. Xinjiang Social Sciences, 2022 (06): 10-19. DOI: 10. 20003/ j. cnki. Mishka. 2022.06.002 

[16] De Gregorio G, Radu R. Digital constructivism in the new era of Internet governance [J]. International Journal of Law and Information Technology, 2022, 30 (1): 68-87 

[17] Shipovalova L V, Chernysheva L A, Gizatullina E G. Digital governance technologies in action, or On the activity of citizens around the platform "Active citizens" [J]. Society of Science and Technology [Sotsiologiya nauki I tekhnologii], 2021, 12 (1): 71-87

[18] Zinjuk M, Deva N, Bogatorija K, Et al. Digital Transformation of Corporate Governance [J]. Financial and credit activity problems of theory and practice, 2022, 5 (46): 300-310 

[19] Wang Wenbin, Wang Qian. Digital Integrated Transformation of Grassroots Governance: Ecology, Logic, and Strategies [J]. Journal of Shenzhen University (Humanities and Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 39 (05): 103-111 

[20] Han Qingling. On the Operational Mechanism of Rural Digital Governance: Multiple Foundations and Practical Paths [J/OL]. Electronic Government: 1-11 [2023-04-08] http: // kns. cnki. net/ kcms/ detail/ 11.5181.TP.20230119.1004.012.html

[21] Wu Kechang, Yan Xinyao. Digital Governance Driven and Public Service Supply Model Transformation: Based on the Practice of Guangdong Province [J]. Electronic Government, 2020 (01): 76-83. DOI: 10.16582/j.cnki.dzzw. 2020.01.008 

[22] Liu Mixia. Research on Digital Transformation Promoting the Modernization of National Governance—Taking the Construction of Digital China as an Example [J]. Administrative Reform, 2022 (09): 13-20. DOI: 10.14150/j.cnki.1674-7453.2022.09.005

[23] Zhao T, Zhang J, Zhao K. E-government construction and government performance level: Imperial research based on 31 provinces in China data [C]//2021 3rd International Conference on Machine Learning, Big Data and Business Intelligence (MLBDBI) IEEE, 2021: 750-755 

[24] Zhu Wanjing. Self-knowledge, reflection, and innovation: the triple connotation of "data governance" [J]. Journal of Southwest University (Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 47 (06): 11-22. DOI: 10.13718/j.cnki.xdsk. 2021.06.002 

[25] Zhao Xin. Current Situation and Optimization Strategies of Digital Transformation of Grassroots Social Governance [J]. Hunan Social Sciences, 2022 (05): 80-89

[26] Omar A. Towards an integrated model of data governance and integration for the implementation of digital transformation processes in the Saudi universities [J]. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 2020, 11 (8) 

[27] Miao Wensheng. The Approach to Integrating Grassroots Social Governance Empowered by Data [J]. Xinjiang Social Sciences, 2023 (01): 137-143. DOI: 10.20003/j.cnki. Mishka.2023.01.016 

[28] Lo Lofgren K, Webster C W R. The value of Big Data in government: The case of 'smart cities' [J]. Big Data&Society, 2020, 7 (1): 2053951720912775

[29] Jiang Mingsi, Lin Xuemei. Research status, evolution, and hotspots of narrative medicine abroad based on WOS papers from 2010 to 2021 [J]. Chinese Medical Science, 2022, 12 (15): 23-27 

[30] Hu Weiwei, Zhou Huanzhu, Cao Tangzhe. The Evolution and Development of Digital Strategy in the United States [J]. Journal of the Chinese Academy of Electronic Sciences, 2022-17 (01): 12-18 

[31] Yang Shuang. Research on the Problems and Countermeasures of Local Government Public Information Services in China [D]. Yanshan University, 2014 

[32] Lin Xinyu. Research on Electronic Government of Fujian Maritime Administration [D]. Dalian Maritime University, 2013

[33] Accelerate the digital development of our province to assist in the governance of the public service system and people's livelihood security services [N] Guizhou Political Consultative Conference News, 2022-06-21 (003). DOI: 10.28306/n.cnki. Guzzi.2022.000381 

[34] Chen Xuwen, Fang Jianyu, Wei Chunmei, Li Jiangbo, Yang Xiaoli. Research and suggestions on the standardization of five color classification for grassroots governance based on risk management [J]. China Standardization, 2021 (03): 137-141 

[35] Zhang Kai, Huang Pei, Fang Jingwen. Challenges Faced by the Modernization of the National Information Security Governance System and Governance Capacity [J/OL]. Intelligence Journal: 1-7 [2023-04-02] http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/61.1167.G3.20230221.1013.016.html