In judicial practice, the applicable standards of legal relations in such cases of civil disputes caused by takeaway riders are not uniform, and it is faced with the problem of how to evaluate such new labor relations and labor rights protection. Therefore, this paper starts with the specific judicial judgment, analyzes the legal status of the labor provider under the platform economic model through the attribute theory, and clarifies how to identify the legal relationship between the labor provider and the platform. On this basis, it further explores how to evaluate the tripartite contract relationship of the platform employment contract. According to the characteristics of labor supply under the platform economy, we should strengthen the application of blockchain in evidence, strengthen the flexibility of case identification standards, and establish a fast mode of occupational risk protection and compensation, and put forward suggestions on the protection of workers ' rights and interests from three perspectives : procedural law, interpretation theory and legislative theory.

Midan Yang, Weiwei Fan. The legal application of new labor relations—taking riders as an example. Academic Journal of Business & Management (2023) Vol. 5, Issue 14: 20-24. https://doi.org/10.25236/AJBM.2023.051404.

[1] Hu Guixia. Identification of the subject of tort liability for damage caused by riders under the new employment form [N]. People's court daily, 2021, 9(7). 

[2] Wang Tianyu. The Interpretation Path and Normative System of ' Class Employees ' for Internet Platform Employment [J]. Global Legal Review, 2020, 3. 

[3] Hong Yingrong, From the diversified labor supply mode of platform economy to discuss the legal status of labor providers and the protection of labor rights and interests[C]. Law Journal of National Chung Cheng University, 2021, 72. 

[4] Huang Chengguan. Labor Law [M]. Taiwan 's ' National 'Aeronautical University, 2002(2):64. 

[5] Guo Linghui. On the Law of Labor Contract [M]. Sanmin Publishing House, 2011:21. 

[6] Han Yan, Han Guoling, Dou Jiangtao. Platform employment cannot avoid the identification of labor relations [N]. People's court daily, 2021, 9. 

[7] Tian Silu. Shared employment: Shared employment: the composition of tripartite contract in ' narrow secondment '[J]. Jurisprudence, 2020, 1.  

[8] Tian Silu: The Evolution and Legal Response to the Atypicalization of Labor Relations[J]. Jurisprudence, 2017, 6. 

[9] Liu Pinxin. Beijing Blockchain Workshop Expert Group Book[M]. Legal Research, 2021, 6. 

[10] Ding Xiaodong. Platform revolution, gig economy and new thinking of labor law[J]. Global Legal Review 2018, 4. 

[11] Seth D. Harries. Practitioners, Security, and Welfare in the ' Gig Economy ' of the United States[J]. Global Law Review, 2018, 4. 

[12] Yang Haonan. Path Selection of China 's Labor Relations Identification Standards under the Background of Sharing Economy[J]. Legal Review, 2021, 3. 

[13] Jin Qiao, Zhou Wei, Guan Jian, Lv Guozhi. Research on Legal Issues of Informal Employment Service Management under ' Internet + ' Mode[C], Shanghai Law Research, 2020, 4. 

[14] Tian Silu, Zheng Chenyu. The Dilemma and Model Selection of Occupational Injury Protection for Platform Practitioners: Takeaway Riders as an Example[J]. China Human Resource Development. 2022, 11.