Welcome to Francis Academic Press

The Frontiers of Society, Science and Technology, 2023, 5(11); doi: 10.25236/FSST.2023.051115.

Expressions and Challenges of ASEAN's "Centrality" in the Context of China-US Strategic Competition

Author(s)

Zhou Wen, Zhu Runlin

Corresponding Author:
Zhou Wen
Affiliation(s)

Shanghai University of Political Science and Law, Shanghai, China, 201701

Abstract

ASEAN covers ten countries in Southeast Asia, and its "centrality" is the key to ASEAN's positioning, and the "talisman" that allows it to play a key role in the regional security architecture and regional order arrangement. ASEAN makes use of its unique role to develop a unique "ASEAN way", establish an ASEAN-centered multi-mechanism platform, and use the strategy of "balanced diplomacy" to effectively maintain the interaction between regional and extra-territorial countries and maintain its own "centrality". However, due to the special characteristics of Southeast Asia, with the new development of Sino-US relations, ASEAN is becoming an important force in the power game between China and the US, and with the escalation of the US Indo-Pacific strategy, ASEAN will face the risk of being decentered and marginalized in the Indo-Pacific region. Therefore, while the ASEAN organization has made great diplomatic achievements in recent years, it is also accompanied by numerous challenges to its future development.

Keywords

ASEAN, China, Indo-Pacific

Cite This Paper

Zhou Wen, Zhu Runlin. Expressions and Challenges of ASEAN's "Centrality" in the Context of China-US Strategic Competition. The Frontiers of Society, Science and Technology (2023) Vol. 5, Issue 11: 94-99. https://doi.org/10.25236/FSST.2023.051115.

References

[1] Cuiping Zhu(2018). Indian Ocean Region Development Report [M], Social Science Literature Press, .

[2] Zhang Tiangui(2021). RCEP: Characteristics, Problems and Prospects [J], International Outlook, No. 2.

[3] Yu Changsen(2004). Theory and Practice of Cooperation in the Asia-Pacific Region [M], China Social Science Press.

[4] Luo Shengrong(2020). ""ASEAN Centrality" is in the Interest of the Region" [J], World Knowledge, No. 22.

[5] Su Hao(2021). "The U.S. Wants to Suppress China in Southeast Asia, Doomed to Difficulty" [J], World Knowledge, No. 18.

[6] Jie Zhang(2021). "Reconstruction of ASEAN Centrism and the Development of China-ASEAN Relations" [J], Studies on International Issues, No. 3.

[7] Ruonan Liu(2020). "Sino-US Strategic Competition and the Transformation of Regional Order in Southeast Asia" [J], World Economy and Politics, No. 8.

[8] Chenyang Li, Li Zhao, and Fei Yang(2020). "On the Practical Utility and Theoretical Significance of the ASEAN Regional Forum" [J], International Observation, No. 6.

[9] Fan Sicong(2020). "The Southeast Asianization of the U.S. Indo-Pacific Strategy and Its Impact on ASEAN" [J], Asia-Pacific Security and Maritime Studies, No. 5.

[10] Wu Lin(2021)."The Impact of Sino-U.S. Institutional Competition on ASEAN's Centrality - Taking the ASEAN Regional Forum (ARF) as an Example" [J], Diplomatic Review, No. 5.

[11] Wang Chuanjian and Zhang Jia(2021). "Challenges to ASEAN Centrality and its Reconstruction under the Indo-Pacific Strategy" [J], International Observer, No. 3.

[12] Liu Ming, Chen Yong(2021). and Shu Biquan, ""Indo-Pacific Strategy": Taking the Strategic Logic, Interests and Tactical Choices of the U.S., India, Japan, and Australia as the Analytical Perspective" [J], Northeast Asia Forum, No. 2.

[13] Anwar Dewi Fortuna(2020). Indonesia and the ASEAN outlook on the Indo-Pacific[J], International Affairs, (1).

[14] Lukas Maximilian Mueller(2020). Challenges to ASEAN centrality and hedging in connectivity governance—regional and national pressure points[J], The Pacific Review, (5).