The construction of an ecological and cultural landscape evaluation system is the basis and prerequisite for the development and protection of the ecological and cultural landscape. To clearly clarify the relationship between the indicators of the ecological and cultural landscape of Gaoqiao Village, AHP is adopted in this paper based on the summary of previous research and results from field surveys of Gaoqiao Village to construct the evaluation system of the ecological and cultural landscape of the village by selecting 21 indicators from four aspects including ecological, cultural, economic and social value, while adopting fuzzy comprehensive valuation method to conduct a comprehensive evaluation towards the landscape at the same time. The results show that the ecological value (0.5003) of the ecological and cultural landscape of Gaoqiao Village is higher than the cultural value (0.2145), economic value (0.1671), and social value (0.1180). The comprehensive evaluation score is 3.3798, which is at a "good" level. The criterion layer scores from high to low are ecological value (3.8634), social value (3.4925), economic value (2.9513), and cultural value (2.5253), indicating that the landscape of Gaoqiao Village has good ecological and social values, but there is still room for improvement in economic and cultural values. How to create a landscape that integrates culture and scenery still needs to be continuously improved and explored.

Yongqing Tang, Hongying Li. Research on the Evaluation of Rural Ecological and Cultural Landscape in Yibin City—Taking Gaoqiao Village in Yibin as an Example. The Frontiers of Society, Science and Technology (2023) Vol. 5, Issue 11: 100-108. https://doi.org/10.25236/FSST.2023.051116.

[1] Zhang Yuqing, Xu Yuanyuan, Zhou Wuzhong. Research on Rural Landscape Evaluation Based on Jiangnan Culture [J]. World Agriculture, 2021, (06):92-99.

[2] Li Xiaobin, Pan Yinan, Shi Chengyong, et al. Research On Protection and Construction of Historical Village Landscape Based on AHP-FCE Model Evaluation[J]. Journal of Northwest Forestry University, 2022, 37(04):257-265. 

[3] Wang Yuncai. Theoretical base and evaluation system of rural landscape assessment in China [J]. Joural of Central China Normal University (Natural Sciences), 2002, 36(3):389-393.

[4] Xie Hualin, Liu Liming. Research advance and index system of rural landscape evaluation [J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2003, 22(6):97-101.

[5] Li Yuqi, Luo Yishuang, Li Yanqing, et al. Establishment of the Evaluation System for Rural Landscape Quality Based on Analytic Hierarchy Process: Taking Western Sichuan Linpan As an example[J]. Journal of Northwest Forestry University, 2018, 33(02):262-268.

[6] Li Kaiyong, Peng Jin. Study on the Evaluation System of Rural Settlement Landscape in Wetland Scenic Area Based on AHP Method: Take the Resettlement Town in Hainan Township, Xichang City, as an Example [J]. Sichuan Architecture, 2020, 40(04):13-15.

[7] Cao Tingting, Ge Yongbo. Research on the Current Situation and Path of Digital Banking Construction of Regional Banks: Evaluation Based on AHP –Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation Method [J]. Credit Reference, 2022, 40(04):13-15.

[8] Huang Guangzhi. Study on the Evaluation and Improvement Strategy of the Rural Landscape in Jinan [D]. Shandong Jianzhu University, 2021.

[9] Cao Maolin. Determination of Evaluation index weights by Analytic Hierarchy Process and Excel Caculation [J]. Jiangsu Science and Technology Information, 2012, (02):39-40.