This paper discusses the issue of climate justice and the theories that have emerged to address it. The paper compares and contrasts the positions of two theories, utilitarianism and egalitarianism, on climate justice. Utilitarianism theory advocates for the pursuit of maximum happiness and places efficiency first. It emphasizes how to get the most benefit in the issue of greenhouse gas emissions. Egalitarianism theory, on the other hand, is based on the core value of granting everyone equal rights and treating everyone as an individual with unique values. It is reasonable that everyone has the right to emit the same amount of greenhouse gases. The paper also defines climate justice as a value system that requires all entities and individuals to be treated in the face of climate change. It is understood as a comprehensive concept that can be explained by axiology and practice. In terms of axiology, climate justice should include values such as security, equality, fairness, freedom, and efficiency. In a practical sense, climate justice should be embodied as enforceable legal norms.

Xiangguang Zhao. A Comparison of Theories Related to Climate Justice. International Journal of Frontiers in Sociology (2023), Vol. 5, Issue 9: 6-10. https://doi.org/10.25236/IJFS.2023.050902.

[1] Dreher, T., & Voyer, M. (2015). Climate refugees or migrants? Contesting media frames on climate justice in the Pacific. Environmental Communication, 9(1), 58-76. 

[2] Page, E. (1999). Intergenerational justice and climate change. Political Studies, 47(1), 53-66. 

[3] Okereke, C. (2010). Climate justice and the international regime. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 1(3), 462-474. 

[4] Norgaard, K. M. (2006). “We don’t really want to know” environmental justice and socially organized denial of global warming in Norway. Organization & Environment, 19(3), 347-370. 

[5] Schlosberg, D., & Collins, L. B. (2014). From environmental to climate justice: climate change and the discourse of environmental justice. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 5(3), 359-374. 

[6] Meikle, M. , Wilson, J.  and Jafry, T.  (2016). Climate justice: between Mammon and Mother Earth. International Journal of Climate Change Strategies and Management, 8(4), 488-504. 

[7] Sultana, F. (2022). Critical climate justice. The Geographical Journal, 188(1), 118-124. 

[8] Vanderheiden, S. (2008). Atmospheric justice: A political theory of climate change. New York: Oxford University press. 

[9] Wang, Y., Zhao, Y., & Song, F. (2020). The ethical issues of animal testing in cosmetics industry. Humanities and Social Sciences, 8(4), 112-116. 

[10] Storper, M. (2011). Justice, efficiency and economic geography: should places help one another to develop? European Urban and Regional Studies, 18(1), 3-21. 

[11] Thompson, J. (2009). Intergenerational justice: Rights and responsibilities in an intergenerational polity. London: Routledge. 

[12] Moellendorf, D. (2015). Climate change justice. Philosophy Compass, 10(3), 173-186. 

[13] Traxler, M. (2002). Fair chore division for climate change. Social Theory and Practice, 28(1), 101-134. 

[14] Rydenfelt, H. (2021). From justice to the good? Liberal utilitarianism, climate change and the coronavirus crisis. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 30(2), 376-383. 

[15] Stern, N. (2006). Stern Review: The economics of climate change. Government of the United Kingdom. 

[16] Cohen, G. A. (2000). If you’re an egalitarian, how come you're so rich. The Journal of Ethics, 4, 1-26. 

[17] Brown, D. A. (2002). American heat: Ethical problems with the United States' response to global warming. Lanham, ML: Rowman & Littlefield. 

[18] Raymond, P. A., Hartmann, J., Lauerwald, R., Sobek, S., McDonald, C., Hoover, M., & Guth, P., et al. (2013). Global carbon dioxide emissions from inland waters. Nature, 503(7476), 355-359. 

[19] Heede, R. (2014). Tracing anthropogenic carbon dioxide and methane emissions to fossil fuel and cement producers, 1854–2010. Climatic Change, 122(1), 229-241. 

[20] Hyams, K. (2009). A just response to climate change: personal carbon allowances and the normal-functioning approach. Journal of Social Philosophy, 40(2), 237-256. 

[21] Jamieson, D.  (2005). Adaptation, mitigation, and justice, Sinnott-Armstrong, W.  and Howarth, R. B.  (Ed.) Perspectives on Climate Change: Science, Economics, Politics, Ethics (Advances in the Economics of Environmental Resources, Vol. 5), Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, pp. 217-248. 

[22] Baatz, C., & Ott, K. (2017). In defence of emissions egalitarianism. Climate Justice and Historical Emissions, 1-28. 

[23] Davidson, M. D. (2021). How fairness principles in the climate debate relate to theories of distributive justice. Sustainability, 13(13), 7302. 

[24] Gandjour, A., & Lauterbach, K. W. (2003). Utilitarian theories reconsidered: common misconceptions, more recent developments, and health policy implications. Health Care Analysis, 11, 229-244.