Welcome to Francis Academic Press

Academic Journal of Business & Management, 2023, 5(18); doi: 10.25236/AJBM.2023.051808.

Analysis of the relationship between corporate board characteristics and corporate performance

Author(s)

Wenxuan Ren

Corresponding Author:
Wenxuan Ren
Affiliation(s)

University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ, United Kingdom

Abstract

Whether board structure is closely related to company performance has been a conflicting topic for more than 30 years. In this article, the characteristics of the board of directors' composition and corporate performance are examined using relevant literature, and the relationship between the two is sorted out using agency theory and management theory. The frequency of board meetings and the makeup of the board are also rigorously examined, as is the effect of gender analysis on business performance. According to the research for this paper, in order to ensure a stable and sustainable growth of the company's performance, the board of directors' size and composition must be modified in accordance with the company's various industries and levels of technological development. The dual role of CEO may be advantageous for some businesses that require short-term strategic development that moves quickly, while the drawbacks outweigh the benefits for those that require long-term solid strategic direction.

Keywords

Board Characteristics; CEO Duality; Corporate performance

Cite This Paper

Wenxuan Ren. Analysis of the relationship between corporate board characteristics and corporate performance. Academic Journal of Business & Management (2023) Vol. 5, Issue 18: 46-51. https://doi.org/10.25236/AJBM.2023.051808.

References

[1] PEARCE J A, ZAHRA S A. The relative power of ceos and boards of directors: Associations with corporate performance[J/OL]. Strategic Management Journal, 1991, 12(2): 135-153. 

[2] MAK Y T, KUSNADI Y. Size really matters: Further evidence on the negative relationship between board size and firm value[J/OL]. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 2005, 13(3): 301-318[2019-04-16]. 

[3] GUEST P M. The impact of board size on firm performance: evidence from the UK[J/OL]. The European Journal of Finance, 2009, 15(4): 385-404. 

[4] ANDERSON R C, MANSI S A, REEB D M. Board characteristics, accounting report integrity, and the cost of debt[J/OL]. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 2004, 37(3): 315-342. 

[5] LIPTON M, LORSCH J W. A Modest Proposal for Improved Corporate Governance[J]. Business Lawyer, 1992, 48(1): 59-77. 

[6] MARIMUTHU M, KOLANDAISAMY I. Ethnic and Gender Diversity in Boards of Directors and Their Relevance to Financial Performance of Malaysian Companies[J/OL]. Journal of Sustainable Development, 2009, 2(3). 

[7] SALANCIK G R, PFEFFER J, KELLY J P. A Contingency Model of Influence in Organizational Decision-Making[J/OL]. The Pacific Sociological Review, 1978, 21(2): 239-256[2019-04-17]. 

[8] FONDAS N. Women on Boards of Directors: Gender Bias or Power Threat?[M/OL]//Issues in Business Ethics. Springer, Dordrecht, 2000: 171-177[2020-03-05]. 

[9] LEE H “Andy”, DENIZCI GUILLET B, LAW R. An Examination of the Relationship between Online Travel Agents and Hotels[J/OL]. Cornell Hospitality Quarterly, 2012, 54(1): 95-107[2019-11-13]. 

[10] HILLMAN A J, DALZIEL T. Boards of Directors and Firm Performance: Integrating Agency and Resource Dependence Perspectives[J/OL]. The Academy of Management Review, 2003, 28(3): 383. 

[11] MURA R. Firm Performance: Do Non-Executive Directors Have Minds of their Own? Evidence from UK Panel Data[J/OL]. Financial Management, 2007, 36(3): 81-112[2020-05-29]. 

[12] FERNANDES N. EC: Board compensation and firm performance: The role of “independent” board members[J/OL]. Journal of Multinational Financial Management, 2008, 18(1): 30-44[2019-11-18]. 

[13] T. VELNAMPY. Corporate Governance and Firm Performance: A Study of Sri Lankan Manufacturing Companies[J]. Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development, 2013, 4(3): 228-235[2023-07-26].

[14] AZEEZ Dr A A. Corporate Governance and Firm Performance: Evidence from Sri Lanka[J/OL]. Journal of Finance and Bank Management, 2015, 3(1)[2019-07-14]. 

[15] ZATTONI A, CUOMO F. How Independent, Competent and Incentivized Should Non-executive Directors Be? An Empirical Investigation of Good Governance Codes[J/OL]. British Journal of Management, 2010, 21(1): 63-79. 

[16] RECHNER P L, DALTON D R. CEO duality and organizational performance: A longitudinal analysis[J/OL]. Strategic Management Journal, 1991, 12(2): 155-160. 

[17] ELSAYED K. Does CEO Duality Really Affect Corporate Performance?[J/OL]. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 2007, 15(6): 1203-1214[2019-04-11]. 

[18] JENSEN M C, MECKLING W H. Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 1976, 3(4): 305-360.

[19] FAMA E F, JENSEN M C. Separation of Ownership and Control[J/OL]. SSRN Electronic Journal, 1983, 26(2). 

[20] NTIM C G, OSEI K A. The Impact of Corporate Board Meetings on Corporate Performance in South Africa[J]. African Review of Economics and Finance, 2011, 2(2): 83-103[2023-07-26].

[21] FRANCIS B B, HASAN I, WU Q. Do Corporate Boards Affect Firm Performance? New Evidence from the Financial Crisis[C/OL]//SSRN Electronic Journal. 2012. 

[22] DONALDSON L. The Ethereal Hand: Organizational Economics and Management Theory[J/OL]. Academy of Management Review, 1990, 15(3): 369-381[2019-05-08]. 

[23] ELUYELA D F, AKINTIMEHIN O O, OKERE W. Board meeting frequency and firm performance: examining the nexus in Nigerian deposit money banks[J/OL]. Heliyon, 2018, 4(10): e00850. 

[24] GRACE M, IRELAND A, DUNSTAN K. Board Composition, Non-Executive Directors’ Characteristics and Corporate Financial Performance[J/OL]. Asia-Pacific Journal of Accounting, 1995, 2(1): 121-137[2019-09-28].

[25] BRAMMER S, MILLINGTON A, PAVELIN S. Gender and Ethnic Diversity Among UK Corporate Boards[J/OL]. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 2007, 15(2): 393-403. 

[26] CAMPBELL K, MÍNGUEZ-VERA A. Gender Diversity in the Boardroom and Firm Financial Performance[J/OL]. Journal of Business Ethics, 2008, 83(3): 435-451. 

[27] RICHARD O C. RACIAL DIVERSITY, BUSINESS STRATEGY, AND FIRM PERFORMANCE: A RESOURCE-BASED VIEW.[J/OL]. Academy of Management Journal, 2000, 43(2): 164-177. 

[28] ROBERSON Q M, HYEON JEONG PARK. Examining the Link Between Diversity and Firm Performance: The Effects of Diversity Reputation and Leader Racial Diversity[J/OL]. Group & Organization Management, 2007, 32(5): 548-568.

[29] BALTA M E, WOODS A, DICKSON K. The Influence Of Boards Of Directors Characteristics On Strategic Decision-Making: Evidence From Greek Companies[J/OL]. Journal of Applied Business Research (JABR), 2010, 26(3)[2020-01-14]. 

[30] BANTEL K A, JACKSON S E. Top management and innovations in banking: Does the composition of the top team make a difference?[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1989, 10(S1): 107-124.

[31] HANOKU BATHULA. Board characteristics and firm performance: evidence from New Zealand[D]. Saarbrücken, Germany: Lap Lambert Academic Publishing, 2008.

[32] DE VILLIERS C, NAIKER V, VAN STADEN C J. The Effect of Board Characteristics on Firm Environmental Performance[J/OL]. Journal of Management, 2011, 37(6): 1636-1663.