With the burgeoning of the internet economy, the behavior of "professional claiming" has emerged. Those engaging in "professional claiming" often aim for unlawful possession. They exploit non-functional or non-substantial defects in product packaging, labeling, or advertising slogans, seeking profits through threats, intimidation, or coercion. Many consumers praise these behaviors, viewing them as acts of "justice on behalf of Heaven." However, the act of purchasing defective products in bulk for compensation not only profanes the law but also disrupts the regular consumer market to a certain extent. Distinguishing whether such behavior is an exercise of rights or an act of extortion remains a challenge in social governance today. Simultaneously, exploring the legalization of "professional claiming" behavior is a future challenge we must face.

Jiachun Chen. Research on the Legal Regulation of "Professional Claims" Behavior. The Frontiers of Society, Science and Technology (2023) Vol. 5, Issue 12: 111-115. https://doi.org/10.25236/FSST.2023.051220.

[1] Zhao Yaxiang. "Are 'Professional Anti-Counterfeiters' Public-Benefit Buyers?—A Quantitative Study Based on the Mechanism of 'Buying Counterfeit and Claiming Compensation'." Journal of Southwest University of Political Science and Law, 2016, 18(04), 94-100.

[2] Zhao Peng. "Reflection on Administrative Law of Punitive Compensation." Legal Research, 2019, 41(01), 41-55.

[3] Chen Zhenwei, Chen Yijian. "Exploration of Criminal Responsibility for Unlawful Rights Protection through Professional Claims." People's Procurator, 2022, (14), 72-73.

[4] Chen Canping, Li Yuliang. "Analysis of Difficulties in Applying Punitive Compensation to Professional Claim Behavior." Journal of Tianjin University (Social Sciences), 2018, 20(01), 47-51.

[5] Liu Zhixin. "Is Professional Claim Behavior Legally Protected?—Starting from a Series of Sake Claim Cases in Japan." Food Safety Guide, 2018, (13), 34-35.