Under the current trend of the growing digital economy, the process of digital transformation is gaining significant importance. The disparity in government policy and business implementation of digital transformation is fairly notable. Anyway, there are still a bunch of problems emerging in this fast-developing era. The government has already implemented relevant policies to address these problems, such as attracting and training experts, enhancing digital infrastructure, and promoting data analysis. Following the outbreak of the Covid-19 pandemic, there has been a gradual shift towards digital transformation in the business sector. In order to facilitate a seamless transformation, it is imperative for the organization to ensure the reconstruction of its enterprise structure and update its corporate culture. The objective of this essay is to examine the extent to which business developments are in line with government policies. After conducting a comprehensive analysis and evaluating the data, the findings can be summarized in a framework table and presented through various charts that illustrate the methods used in Technology, Organization, and Environment (TOE) research. By making reference to the provided formula, a novel model can be formulated for the computation of the digital degree of enterprises. Additionally, we can construct a table based on the data and policies obtained from the business. Thus, according to a sample of 672 enterprises' annual reports submitted to the Shenzhen Trading Securities Exchange, we can conclude that government policies and enterprise developments encompass three fundamental dimensions: technology, organization, and environment. These dimensions are all essential components in the process of fostering digital transformation. Technology plays a crucial role in the digital transformation of enterprises, they need effective organizational management and the government has recognized this importance. Additionally, the government provides substantial support to businesses.

Xinyue Li, Jianheng Chen, Qianyu Yin, Ziyi Xu, Jingyi Li, Haoran Jin. A Comparative Analysis of National Policies and Enterprise Practices for Enterprise Digital Transformation. Academic Journal of Business & Management (2023) Vol. 5, Issue 19: 58-68. https://doi.org/10.25236/AJBM.2023.051910.

[1] M. Ghobakhloo, M. Fathi, Corporate survival in Industry 4.0 era: the enabling role of lean digitized manufacturing, J. Manuf. Technol. Manage., 31 (2019), 1–30. 

[2] Manesh, M. F., Pellegrini, M. M., Marzi, G., & Dabic, M. (2020). Knowledge management in the fourth industrial revolution: Mapping the literature and scoping future avenues. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 68(1), 289-300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101738\

[3] Wu, F., Hu, H.Z., Lin, H.Y. Corporate digital transformation and capital market performance- empirical evidence from stock liquidity. Manag. World 2021, 37, 130–144.

[4] Chen, H., Tian, Z. Environmental uncertainty, resource orchestration and digital transformation: A fuzzy-set QCA approach. J. Bus. Res. 2022, 139, 184–193.

[5] Lemon, K.N., Verhoef, P.C. Understanding customer experience throughout the customer journey. J. Mark. 2016, 80, 69–96.

[6] Fitzgerald, M., Kruschwitz, N., Bonnet, D., Welch, M. Embracing digital technology: A new strategic imperative. MIT Sloan Manag. Rev. 2014, 55, 1–12.

[7] Verhoef, P.C., Broekhuizen, T., Bart, Y., Bhattacharya, A., Dong, J.Q., Fabian, N., Haenlein, M. Digital transformation: A multidisciplinary reflection and research agenda. J. Bus. Res. 2021, 122, 889–901.

[8] Dai, D., Han, S., Zhao, M., Xie, J. The Impact Mechanism of Digital Transformation on the Risk-Taking Level of Chinese Listed Companies. Sustainability 2023, 15, 1938. https://doi. org/10. 3390/su 15031938

[9] Kleis, L., Chwelos, P., Ramirez, R. V., Cockburn, I. Information technology and intangible output: The impact of IT investment on innovation productivity. Inf. Syst. Res. 2012, 23, 42–59.

[10] Frishammar, J., Ake Horte, S. Managing external information in manufacturing firms: The impact on innovation performance. J. Prod. Innov. Manag. 2005, 22, 251–266.

[11] Wang, C., Lu, I., Chen, C. Evaluating firm technological innovation capability under uncertainty. Technovation 2008, 28, 349–363.

[12] Eisenhardt, K. M., Martin, J. A. Dynamic Capabilities: What Are They? Strateg. Manag. J. 2000, 21, 1105–1121.

[13] Zahra, S.A., Sapienza, H.J., Davidsson, P. Entrepreneurship and Dynamic Capabilities: A Review, Model and Research Agenda. J. Manag. Stud. 2006, 43, 917–955.

[14] Nguyen, T. H., Le, X. C., & Vu, T. H. L. (2022). An extended technology- organization- environment (TOE) framework for online retailing utilization in digital transformation: empirical evidence from vietnam. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 8(4), 200.

[15] Hunguang Bai, Matthew Quaysona, Joseph Sarkis. COVID-19 pandemic digitization lessons for sustainable development of micro-and small- enterprises [J]. Elsevier 2021, 4