Welcome to Francis Academic Press

The Frontiers of Society, Science and Technology, 2019, 1(7); doi: 10.25236/FSST.2019.010706.

Combination of Uses and Gratification Theory and Mental Accounting Model on Inter-Media Recommender System

Author(s)

Chu Wentao

Corresponding Author:
Chu Wentao
Affiliation(s)

Arts and Media College of Anhui University, Hefei Anhui 230001, China

Abstract

When the new media usually represented by the Internet and mobile terminals met traditional mass communication. The uses and gratification theory which hold the perspective from the audience by analyzing the audience's media contact motivation and what these contacts meet their needs. This article tries to find a Find a mixed solution to the problem by delighting the interaction of gratification and media type and need to combine the mass communication theory, uses and gratification theory, and consumer behavior theory, mental accounting theory together, thus give a clearer view of media with both social character and business character. In addition, discuss a new way to create a more effective recommender system, inter-media recommender system.

Keywords

Uses and gratification theory; Mental accounting model; Recommender system; New media; Movie recommendation

Cite This Paper

Chu Wentao. Combination of Uses and Gratification Theory and Mental Accounting Model on Inter-Media Recommender System. The Frontiers of Society, Science and Technology (2019) Vol. 1 Issue 7: 52-58.

References

[1] Elihu Katz, Jay G. Blumler, and Michael Gurevitch (1973-1974). Uses and Gratifications Research.The Public Opinion Quarterly,vol.37, no.4, pp.509-523.
[2] David Goldberg, David Nichols, Brian M. Oki, Douglas Terry (1992). Using collaborative filtering to weave an information tapestry, Communications of the ACM-Special issue on information filtering, vol.35, no.12, pp.61-70.
[3] McQuail, D. J. G. Blumler, and J. R. Brown (1972). The television audience: a revised perspective. In Sociology of mass communications, ed. D. McQuail. Harmondsworth, Penguin.
[4] Thomas F. Stafford, and Marla Royne Stafford, Lawrence L. Schkade (2004). Determining Uses and Gratification for the Internet, Decision Sciences, vol.35, no.2, pp.15-16.
[5] Mark Claypool, Anuja Gokhale, Tim Miranda, Pavel Murnikov, Dmitry Netes and Matthew Sartin (1999). Combining Content-Based and Collaborative Filter in an Online Newspaper, Computer Science Technical Report Series.
[6] Ogul.H., Ekmekciler.E (2012). Two-way collaborative filtering on semantically enhanced movie ratings. Iti International Conference on Information Technology Interfaces. IEEE.
[7] Eui-Hong (Sam) Han, George Karypis (2005). Feature-Based Recommendation System, 2005 ACM 1-59593-140-6/05/0010.Everett M. Roger, Diffusion of Innovations Fifth Edition.
[8] J. Ben Schafer, Dan Frankowski, Jon Herlocker, and Shilad Sen (2007). Collaborative Filtering Recommender Systems, The Adaptive Web, LNCS no.4321, pp. 291-324,
[9] Karypis.G., Karypis.G. (2005). Feature-based recommendation system. Acm International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management.Shani, G., Heckerman, D., & Brafman, R. I. (2005). An mdp-based recommender system. Journal of Machine Learning Research, vol.6, no.1, pp.1265-1295.
[10] Van Setten, M., Veenstra.M, Nijholt.A., Van Dijk.B (2006). Goal-based structuring in recommender systems. Interacting with Computers,vol.18,no.3, pp.432-456.
[11] Richard.H. Thaler (2008). Mental Accounting and Consumer Choice. Marketing Science, vol. 27, no. 1, pp.15-25.
[12] Ran Kivtetz (1999). Advances in Research on Mental Accounting and Reason-based Choices. Marketing Letter, vol.10, no.3, pp.249-266.