Academic Journal of Computing & Information Science, 2023, 6(10); doi: 10.25236/AJCIS.2023.061011.
Yueyao Li1, Ziyu Liu2, Ziyao Zhu1, Zixuan Zhou3, Yan Guo4
1School of Insurance and Economics, University of International Business and Economics, Beijing, 100029, China
2Business School, University of International Business and Economics, Beijing, 100029, China
3School of Cultural Industries Management, Communication University of China, Beijing, 100024, China
4School of Banking and Finance, University of International Business and Economics, Beijing, 100029, China
This paper focuses on demonstrating that GGDP is a better indicator of a country's economic health than GDP. In this study, seven variables were selected as secondary indicators, and then CO2 emissions were used as dependent variables, and the identified seven variables were used as independent variables for multiple regression. In this regression, significant and robust results are obtained, which can prove that using GGDP as a macroeconomic variable is more environmentally friendly. This paper also uses the cross validation method to train the Gaussian process regression model, and obtains better regression results (R2= 99.9 %, RMSE = 1.364e + 5).
Green GDP, CO2, MRA-GPR
Yueyao Li, Ziyu Liu, Ziyao Zhu, Zixuan Zhou, Yan Guo. Research on GGDP Evaluation System Based MRA-GPR Analysis. Academic Journal of Computing & Information Science (2023), Vol. 6, Issue 10: 73-78. https://doi.org/10.25236/AJCIS.2023.061011.
[1] Marcus, R. D., Kane, R. E., 2007. US national income and product statistics: born of the great depression and World War II. Bureau Econ. Anal. Surv. Curr. Bus. 87, 32-46.
[2] McCulla, S. H., Smith, S., 2007. Measuring the Economy: a Primer on GDP and the National Income and Product Accounts. Bureau of Economic Analysis: US Department of Commerce, Washington, DC.
[3] Stiglitz, J. E., Sen, A., Fitoussi, J. -P., 2009. Report by the Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress. Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress, Paris.
[4] Stiglitz, J. E., Sen, A., Fitoussi, J. P., 2010. Mismeasuring our lives: why GDP doesn't add up. The New Press, New York.
[5] Giannetti, B. F., Agostinho, F., Almeida, C. M. V. B., & Huisingh, D. (2015). A review of limitations of GDP and alternative indices to monitor human wellbeing and to manage eco-system functionality. Journal of cleaner production, 87, 11-25.
[6] Daly, H. E., Cobb, J., 1989. For the common good: redirecting the economy toward community, the environment, and a sustainable future. Beacon, Boston, MA.
[7] World Bank, 1997. Expanding the measure of wealth: indicators of environmentally sustainable development. World Bank, Washington, DC.
[8] Costanza, R., Farley, J., Templet, P., 2002. Background: the quality of life and the distribution of wealth and resources. Ecosummit 2000: Understanding and Solving Environmental Problems in the 21st Century. Elsevier.
[9] United Nations, 2003. Integrated environmental and economic accounting 2003. United Nations, New York.
[10] Ayres, R., 2004. On the life cycle metaphor: where ecology and economics diverge. Ecological Economics 48, 425–438.