Welcome to Francis Academic Press

The Frontiers of Society, Science and Technology, 2019, 1(10); doi: 10.25236/FSST.2019.011002.

Research on Strategic Choice of Enterprise Innovation under the Shared Economy

Author(s)

Wang Na1,2, Wang Jian1

Corresponding Author:
Wang Na
Affiliation(s)

1 School of Marxism, Northeastern University, Shenyang, Liaoning 110169, China
2 Liaoning University of Petroleum and Chemical Technology, Fushun, Liaoning 113001, China

Abstract

Under the shared economy model, based on the analysis of the actual confusion of the strategic choice of enterprise innovation, the expedition is divided into four dimensions by the level of technological innovation orientation and market innovation orientation, and the acquisition model of enterprise competitive advantage is constructed. The model is used to illustrate the relationship between different innovation strategies and competitive advantages, and the example of shared bicycle companies is verified. Research shows that first-time market enterprises can obtain certain competitive advantages by adopting high-tech oriented or high-market-oriented innovation strategies. However, with the maturity of the market and the intensification of competition, only high-tech orientation is adopted under the premise of capital security. However, with the maturity of the market and the intensification of competition, under the premise of capital security, only by adopting the integration and innovation strategy of high-tech orientation and high-market orientation can we obtain the strongest competitive advantage and promote the sustainable development of enterprises.

Keywords

Shared economy; Enterprise innovation; Technology orientation; Market orientation; Competitive advantage

Cite This Paper

Wang Na, Wang Jian. Research on Strategic Choice of Enterprise Innovation under the Shared Economy. The Frontiers of Society, Science and Technology (2019) Vol. 1 Issue 10: 21-32. https://doi.org/10.25236/FSST.2019.011002.

References

[1] Felson M, Spaeth J L (1978). Community structure and collaborative consumption: a routine activity approach .American Behavioral Scientist, vol.21, no.1, pp.614- 624.
[2] Chang Xiaoran, Chen Xiaoling, Jiang Yuanlin (2015). Matching research between network location and enterprise strategic orientation. Journal of Xidian University (Social Science Edition), no.4, pp.1-15.
[3] Shi Huibin, Chen Jinliang, Yang Dong (2017). The Impact of Strategic Orientation on External Innovation Search Strategies--An Empirical Study Based on Hong Kong-Funded Enterprises. Technology and Economy, vol.36, no.1, pp.14-21.
[4] Berthon P, Hulbert J, Pitt L F (1999). To Serve Or Create? Strategic Orientations Towards Customers and Innovation. California Management Review, vol.42, no.1, pp. 37-58.
[5] Lawton L, Parasuraman A (1980). The Impact of the Marketing Concept on New Product Planning .Journal of Marketing, vol.44, no.1, pp.19-25.
[6] Shu Hsien Liao,Ta Chien Hu (2007). Knowledge Transfer and Competitive Advantage on Environmental Uncertainty: An Empirical Study of the Taiwan Semiconductor Industry. Technovation, no. 27, pp.402-411.
[7] Lichtenthaler U. Ernst H (2006). Attitudes to Externally Organising Knowledge Management Tasks: A Review, Reconsideration and Extension of the NIH Syndrome.R&D Management, vol.36, no.4, pp.367-386.
[8] Tang Qingli (2015). The regulatory path of the “special car class” sharing economy. China Law, no.4, pp.286
[9] Nonaka I (1994). A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation. Organization Science, vol. 5, no.1, pp.14-37.
[10] Xu Fang, Yang Guoliang, Zheng Haijun (2013).Research on the methodology of science and technology policy based on knowledge innovation process. Science of Science, no.4, pp.510-517.
[11] Inkpen A C, Dinur A (1998). Knowledge Management Processes and International Joint Ventures. Organization Science, no.9, pp.454-468.
[12] Hogan, J E (2001). Expected relationship value: A construct, a methodology for measurement and a modeling technique. Industrial Marketing Management, no.30, pp.339-351.
[13] Zahra S, George G (2000). Absorptive Capacity: A Review, Reconce- ptualization, and Extension. The Academy of Management Review, vol.27, no.2, pp.185-203.
[14] Forbes Daniel P (2005). Are Some Entrepreneurs More Overconfidence than Others?. Journal of Business Venturing, no.20, pp.623-640.
[15] Chen Ming Jer (1996). Competitor Analysis and Interfirm Rivalry: Toward a Theoretical Integration. Academy of Management Review, no.21, pp.100-134.
[16] Hao Sanyong (2018). Sharing bicycle management innovation in the perspective of sharing economy. Truth, no.3, pp.12-13.