Social media platforms, with their unique creative style, are rapidly gaining popularity and occupying more and more of children's time. However, when it comes to food-related behaviors, few studies have explored their effects on children. Therefore, a study on the impact of unhealthy food marketing on children on social media platforms was proposed. This review aims to assess the evidence on how children's exposure to unhealthy food marketing on social media platforms affects their cognitive, emotional and behavioural responses to food and food brands. A systematic review and meta-analysis based on research questions centered on the effects of online food marketing techniques on food attitudes, preferences, and consumption among children (0-18 years of age), and whether there is a covariate effect on outcomes due to children's vulnerability. Under the guidance of PRISMA, a systematic review was conducted through a variety of research methods, such as qualitative and quantitative methods. The results of the study showed that a total of 31 articles were included to identify negative outcomes of the social media influence of unhealthy food marketing, such as unhealthy food brand preference, consumption preference, tendency to skip breakfast (heterogeneity 97.8%, large, SMD:0.38, medium, etc.). 95% CI:0.33,0.40), higher frequency of consumption of unhealthy foods (heterogeneity 95.6%, SMD:0.5, 95% CI:0.35,0.55), and subgroup analysis stratified by age and exposure conditions. It is concluded that exposure to unhealthy food advertisements on social media can increase the consumption and preference of unhealthy food among children and adolescents. These data provide support for public health researchers to explore more consistent research methods and collect more data.

Mingxin Guo. The impact of unhealthy food marketing on children on social media platforms. The Frontiers of Society, Science and Technology (2023) Vol. 5, Issue 15: 58-62. https://doi.org/10.25236/FSST.2023.051511.

[1] Kelly B, King L, Chapman K, Boyland E, Bauman AE, Baur LA. A hierarchy of unhealthy food promotion effects: Identifying methodological approaches and knowledge gaps. Am J Public Health. 2015; 105(4):e86-e95. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.302476. 

[2] van Berlo ZM, van Reijmersdal EA, Eisend M. The gamification of branded content: A meta-analysis of advergame effects. J Advert. 2021;50(2):179-196. doi: 10.1080/00913367. 2020. 1858462.

[3] Folkvord F, Anschütz DJ, Buijzen M, Valkenburg PM. The effect of playing advergames that promote energy-dense snacks or fruit on actual food intake among children. Am J Clin Nutr. 2013; 97(2): 239-245. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.112.047126.

[4] Coates AE, Hardman CA, Halford JCG, Christiansen P, Boyland EJ. The effect of influencer marketing of food and a “protective” advertising disclosure on children’s food intake. Pediatr Obes. 2019; 14(10):e12540. doi: 10.1111/ijpo.12540.

[5] Sina E, Boakye D, Christianson L, Ahrens W, Hebestreit A. Social media and children’s and adolescents’ diets: A systematic review of the underlying social and physiological mechanisms. Adv Nutr. 2022; 13(3):913-937. doi: 10.1093/advances/nmac018. 

[6] Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Int J Surg. 2021; 88:105906. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2021.105906.

[7] Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, Chandler J, et al. Updated guidance for trusted systematic reviews: a new edition of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019; 10: ED000142. doi: 10.1002/14651858.ED000142. 

[8] Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Academic Press; 2013.

[9] Lin L, Chu H. Quantifying publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics. 2018; 74(3):785-794. doi: 10.1111/biom.12817. 

[10] Armijo-Olivo S, Stiles CR, Hagen NA, Biondo PD, Cummings GG. Assessment of study quality for systematic reviews: A comparison of the Cochrane collaboration risk of bias tool and the effective public health practice project quality assessment tool: Methodological research. J Eval Clin Pract. 2012; 18:12-18. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753. 2010.01516.x.

[11] Boerman SC, van Reijmersdal EA. Disclosing influencer marketing on YouTube to children: The moderating role of para-social relationship. Front Psychol. 2020; 10: 3042. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg. 2019. 03042.

[12] Ye G, Hudders L, De Jans S, De Veirman. The value of influencer marketing for business: A bibliometric analysis and managerial implications. J Advert. 2021; 50(2):160-178. doi: 10.1080/ 00913367. 2020.1857888.

[13] Li X, Ling L. A reputation-based trust model for peer-to-peer e-commerce communities. IEEE. 2003, 275-284. 

[14] Bruce AS, Bruce JM, Black WR, et al. Branding and a child’s brain: an fMRI study of neural responses to logos. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2014; 9(1):118-22. doi: 10.1093/scan/nss109.

[15] Potvin Kent M, Pauzé E, Roy EA, de Billy N, Czoli C. Children and adolescents’ exposure to food and beverage marketing in social media apps. Pediatr Obes. 2019; 14(6):e12508. doi: 10.1111/ijpo. 12508.