Welcome to Francis Academic Press

Academic Journal of Business & Management, 2023, 5(21); doi: 10.25236/AJBM.2023.052115.

Research on the risk contagion effect between commercial banks in China under tail risk events

Author(s)

Huang Huicong

Corresponding Author:
Huang Huicong
Affiliation(s)

Guangxi Normal University, Guilin, China

Abstract

With the outbreak of the conflict between Russia and Ukraine, the study of financial risks under the tail event has become the mainstream. This paper selected eleven commercial banks in China as research objects, and used the TVP-VAR risk spillover index model to study the risk contagion effect among commercial banks in China. The results show that compared with other commercial banks, the risk spillover and spillover strength between state-owned commercial banks is larger. Compared with the Ukraine crisis, Sino-US trade friction has a greater impact on the market risk spillover effect of commercial banks, and the overall spillover index shows a significant jump upward trend. The smaller the comprehensive volume and scale of commercial banks, the more vulnerable they are to risk spillover from other commercial banks in the whole market risk spillover network of commercial banks, and they become the commercial banks with the greatest risk spillover intensity.

Keywords

Tail risk events; Risk contagion effect; TVP-VAR model

Cite This Paper

Huang Huicong. Research on the risk contagion effect between commercial banks in China under tail risk events. Academic Journal of Business & Management (2023) Vol. 5, Issue 21: 103-111. https://doi.org/10.25236/AJBM.2023.052115.

References

[1] Furfine H C. (2003). Interbank Exposures: Quantifying the Risk of Contagion. Journal of Money(1),35.

[2] Ma Junlu, Fan Xiaoyun & Cao Yuantao. (2007). Risk estimation and systematic analysis of bilateral contagion in China interbank market. Economic Research (01),68-78+142.

[3] Upper C, Worms A. (2004). Estimating bilateral exposures in the German interbank market: Is there a danger of contagion? European Economic Review(4),48.

[4] Yang Zihui & Zhou Yinggang. (2018). Global systemic financial risk spillover and external shocks. China Social Sciences (12),69-90+200-201.

[5] Wang Yan. (2020). Study on network contagion of systemic risks in China's banking industry. Economic Issues (12), 29-36.

[6] Xu Fangda & Wang Zengtao. (2020). Institutional transmission, network association and systemic risk diffusion in financial industry. Statistics and Decision (12), 134-137.

[7] Fang Yi, Wen Jia & Jing Zhongbo. (2019). Study on the Spillover Effect of Sino-US Trade Friction on China Financial Market. Finance and Trade Economy (06), 55-69.

[8] Qian Shuitu & Wang Lili. (2014). Study on the contagion effect of bilateral risks between banks in China-from the perspective of export demand fluctuation. Financial Theory and Practice (05), 23-28.

[9] Jin Yuying, Luo Ziqi & Nie Guangyu. (2020). Capital flow management in China from the perspective of international fund investment: effectiveness and spillover. Economic Research (07),21-40.