Common prosperity is the prosperity shared and built by all people. Corporate social responsibility is the core force to promote the goal of Common prosperity. In the new journey of promoting Common prosperity, small and medium-sized private enterprises promote high-quality development of enterprises and improve the income level of employees by fulfilling their social responsibilities, which is crucial to the improvement of the overall income level of society and the formation of an olive shaped income structure. We should establish a dual driving mechanism for the fulfillment of responsibilities, driven by external forces such as government, stakeholders, and society, as well as internal forces such as entrepreneurial awareness and cognition. We should promote small and medium-sized private enterprises to fulfill their responsibilities to employees, increase the proportion of labor income distribution, "share the cake well", fulfill their responsibilities to shareholders, and consolidate the "big cake" at the bottom of the pyramid. We should fulfill our responsibilities to external stakeholders and achieve high-quality development by "doing the cake well", So as to help achieve the goal of Common prosperity at an early date.

Wenjun Ren. The Construction of Social Responsibility Motivation Mechanism of Small and Medium Sized Private Enterprises under the Goal of Common Prosperity. Academic Journal of Business & Management (2023) Vol. 5, Issue 21: 163-169. https://doi.org/10.25236/AJBM.2023.052124.

[1] Xin Jie. Research on corporate social responsibility: a new theoretical framework and empirical analysis [D]. Jinan: Shandong University, 2009. 

[2] Li Shi. The goal of Common prosperity and the choice of path to achieve it [J]. Economic Research, 2021, (11): 4-13. 

[3] Xiao Hongjun, Zhang Zhe. Social responsibility strategy of state-owned enterprises under the goal of "Common prosperity" [J]. Tsinghua Management Review, 2022, (Z1): 96-102. 

[4] Liu Peilin, Qian Tao, Huang Xianhai, etc. The connotation, realization path and measurement method of Common prosperity [J]. Management World, 2021, (8): 117-129. 

[5] Zhou Jianhua, Zhang Wenting. Historical Evolution of the Concept and Connotation of "Common prosperity" [J]. Jiangxi Social Sciences, 2022, (9): 15-21. 

[6] Wu Wenxin, Cheng Enfu. Common prosperity in the New Era: Prerequisites and Four dimensional Logic [J]. Shanghai Economic Research, 2021, (11): 5-19. 

[7] Oliver Sheldon. The Philosophy of Management [M]. London: Sir Isaac Pitman and Sons Ltd, 1924. 

[8] Bowen H R. Social Responsibilities of the Businessman [M]. New York: Harper, 1953. 

[9] Carroll A B. A Three-dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Performance [J]. Academy of Management Review, 1979, 4 (4):497-505. 

[10] Vaillant Y, Lafuente E. Entrepreneurial Experience and the Innovativeness of Serial Entrepreneurs [J]. Management Decision, 2019, 57(11):2869-2889. 

[11] Freeman R E. Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach [M]. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1984. 

[12] Zhang Zhaoguo, Liang Zhigang, Yin Kaiguo. Research on Corporate Social Responsibility from the Stakeholder Perspective [J]. China Soft Science, 2012, (2): 139-146. 

[13] Elkington. Towards the Suitable Corporation: Win -win -win Business Strategies for Sustainable Development [J]. California Management Review, 1994, 36(2):90-100. 

[14] Xiao Hongjun. Reflection and Transcendence on the Paradigm of Shared Value Corporate Social Responsibility [J]. Management World, 2020, (5): 87-115+133. 

[15] Dahlsrud A. How Corporate Social Responsibility Is Defined: An Analysis of 37 Definitions. [J]. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 2008. 15(1):1-13.  

[16] Carroll A B., Shabana K M. The Business Case for Corporate Social Responsibility: A Review of Concepts, Research and Practice [J]. International Journal of Management Reviews, 2010, 12(1): 85~105. 

[17] Ackerman R W. How Companies Respond to Social Demands [J]. Harvard Business Review, 1973, 51(4): 88~98. 

[18] A MC Williams, D S Siegel, P M Wright. Guest Editors’ Introduction Corporate Social Responsibility: Strategic Implications [J]. Journal of Management Studies, 2006, 43(1):1-18. 

[19] Porter M E., Kramer M R. The Competitive Advantage of Corporate Philanthropy [J]. Harvard Business Review, 2002, 80(12):56~68. 

[20] Porter M E., Kramer M R. Strategy and Society: The Link between Competitive Advantage and Corporate Social Responsibility [J]. Harvard Business Review, 2006, 84(12):78~92. 

[21] Porter M E., Kramer M R. The Big Idea Creating Shared Value: How to Reinvent Capitalism and Unleasha Wave of Innovation and Growth [J]. Harvard Business Review, 2011, 89(1-2):1~17. 

[22] Hiller J S. The Benefit Corporation and Corporate Social Responsibility [J]. Journal of Business Ethics, 2013, 118(2):287~301. 

[23] Fifka M S. Corporate Responsibility Reporting and Its Determinants in Comparative Perspective: A Review of the Empirical Literature and a Meta-analysis [J]. Business Strategy and the Environment, 2013, 22(1):1-35. 

[24] Joseph E. Corporate Social Responsibility: Delivering the New Agenda [J]. New Economy, 2001, 8(2): 121-123. 

[25] Yang Panpan. Corporate social responsibility performance: theoretical logic, practical essentials and promotion path [J]. Journal of Finance and accounting, 2020, (22): 135-143. 

[26] Tian Hong, Jiang Yufeng. Research on the dynamic mechanism of corporate social responsibility [J]. Audit and economic research, 2014, (6): 65-74. 

[27] Liu Yuhuan. Research on Driving mechanism of corporate Social responsibility report disclosure behavior in China [D]. Chengdu: University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, 2014. 

[28] Zhang Qiangzhong, He Xinyue, Zhang pan, et al. Research on the dynamic mechanism of social responsibility performance of state-owned enterprises [J]. Management case study and review, 2022, (2): 172-183. 

[29] Friedman M. Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase its Profits [M]. New York: New York Times, 1970.