International Journal of Frontiers in Sociology, 2023, 5(12); doi: 10.25236/IJFS.2023.051221.
Yingdong Shen1, Ziyi Gong2
1School of Politics and Public Administration, Qufu Normal University, Rizhao, Shandong, China
2School of Politics and Public Administration, Qufu Normal University, Rizhao, Shandong, China
The rapid development of artificial intelligence, such as robots, has not only improved people's lives and accelerated the development of society, but also triggered ethical debates about whether robots have moral status. This paper discusses the importance of the internal "spirit" (or "soul"), and discusses the transformation of the moral status of robots from the perspective of human-machine relationship. It is concluded that the current robots still do not have moral status, but at the same time, it also raises the question of whether the era of strong artificial intelligence should give robots moral status. Based on this, the theory of ethical behaviourism is introduced in order to establish a comprehensive new criterion for judging moral status in response to the debate about the moral status of robots with full autonomous consciousness in the future.
Robot, Moral Status, Moral Consciousness, Ethical Behaviourism
Yingdong Shen, Ziyi Gong. Reflections on the Moral Status of Robots—The Establishment of Moral Status Standards for Robots in the Era of Strong Artificial Intelligence. International Journal of Frontiers in Sociology (2023), Vol. 5, Issue 12: 130-134. https://doi.org/10.25236/IJFS.2023.051221.
[1] Tongjin Yang. On the Moral Bearer Status of Robots and Its Normative Implications. Philosophical Analysis, (2019) 10 (06), 14-33+191.
[2] Hongyu Liu. Research on Robot Moral Decision-making Approach and Model. Studies in Dialectics of Nature, (2021) 37 (09), 28-34+82.
[3] Le Yu. Can Intelligent Robots have Rights? Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology (Social Science Edition), (2020) 34 (05), 17-24.
[4] Deborah G. Johnson. Computer Systems:Moral Entities but not Moral Agents. Ethics and Information Technology, (2006) 8 (4).
[5] Donghao Wang. Exploration of Robot Ethical Issues. Future and Development, (2013) 36 (05), 18-21.
[6] Yibin Dai. How is Artificial Intelligence Ethics Possible?—Based on the Perspective of Moral Subject and Moral Receiver. Studies in Ethics, (2020) 05, 96-102.
[7] Bekey G A. Autonomous Robots: From Biological Inspiration to Implementation and Control. MIT Press, (2005).
[8] Lingyin Su. A Review of Current Foreign Research on Robot Ethics. Journal of Xinjiang Normal University (Philosophy and Social Science), (2019) 40 (01), 105-122.
[9] Tieyan Yin, Jinping Dai. Philosophical Implications, Practical Issues and Governance Approaches of Artificial Intelligence Ethics. Journal of Kunming University of Science and Technology(Social Science), (2021) 21 (06),28-38.
[10] Qiongqiong Li, Zhen Li. The Dialectic of “Human-Machine Relationship” in the Age of Intelligence - Contemporary Echoes of Marx's Thought on Man and Machine. Studies on Mao Zedong and Deng Xiaoping Theories, (2021) 01, 71-79+108.
[11] Kunru Yan. Do Artificial Intelligence Machines have a Moral Subject Status? Studies in Dialectics of Nature, (2019) 35 (05), 47-51.
[12] Li Zhang, Peng Chen. A Critique of the Theory of Robot “Personality” and the Legal Regulation of Artificial Intelligence Objects. Academics in China, (2018) 12, 53-75.
[13] Danaher John. Welcoming Robots into the Moral Circle: A Defence of Ethical Behaviourism. Science and engineering ethics, (2019) 26 (4).
[14] Karl Marx, Frederick Engels. Karl Marx, Frederick Engels: collected works (Volume 1). People's Publishing House, (2009), 501.