Welcome to Francis Academic Press

International Journal of Frontiers in Sociology, 2023, 5(13); doi: 10.25236/IJFS.2023.051301.

Discussion on should museums sell items from their collections


Pan Jingxian

Corresponding Author:
Pan Jingxian

Faculty of Law, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China


In May 2009, the Art Institute of Chicago raised admission prices by 50% in order to pay for operating expenses. When Chicagoans threatened to stop visiting the museum, the person in charge explained that the increase was essential for the museum to continue sustaining its mission, unless losses could be reduced by selling the collection. In 2019, the increasingly severe financial crisis hit museum operations harder due to the global outbreak of Covid-19, Stephane Destinquin, founder of the French creative consultancy (Fabernovel), suggested that the French government could help eliminate the huge debt France had accumulated during the covid-19 epidemic by selling the Mona Lisa. Both of these examples reflect a question, that is whether museums can subsidize their operating costs by disposing of their collections in a profitable way during a difficult economic climate. Although the public and the media are generally resistant to and critical of this issue, there are many successful cases of market-based disposal of collections in practice. This article will therefore provide a legal analysis on the feasibility of museums selling their collections so as to provide some insights and direction of research for museums to better deal with their collections.


Transferability of museum collections, Protection of museum collections, the public trust doctrine

Cite This Paper

Pan Jingxian. Discussion on should museums sell items from their collections. International Journal of Frontiers in Sociology (2023), Vol. 5, Issue 13: 1-7. https://doi.org/10.25236/IJFS.2023.051301.


[1] Sara T. In museums we trust: analyzing the mission of museums, deaccessioning policies[M]. The public trust, 2012: 855, 856, 860, 898, 910, 911.

[2] Glenn D L. A Deontological Approach to Art Museums and the Public Trust, in WHOSE MUSE[M]. Art museums and the public trust, 2004: 129.

[3] Hao Y Z. On the Legal Status of Chinese Museums[C]. Practice and Thinking of Museums in the New Century. Proceedings of the Fifth Academic Conference of Beijing Museum Society, 2007.

[4] Jiao J L. On the Legal Attributes of Museum Collections[J]. Beijing Wenbowen Collection, 2015(02): 98, 102.

[5] Hou Y. Research and Utilization of Public Property from the Perspective of Administrative Law[M]. Beijing Museum Academic Conference, 2012: 30.

[6] Jorjaackers C. The Sell Art: Why A Broader Deaccession Policy Today Could Save Museums Tomorrow [M]. Southern California Interdisciplinary Law Journal, 2011:365.

[7] China Museum Association. Selected Documents of Museum Regulations [M]. China Law Society, 2010: 170, 172.

[8] Wang Y F. Operational problems and solutions of state-owned museums from the perspective of law and ethics [J]. Literary and Museological Journal, 2022(03): 73.

[9] Liu Z L. The 'Gray Area' - Can Museums Sell Their Collections? [J]. Art Appreciation, 2021(01):138.

[10] Chi P P. De-accessioning of collections-take the Glenbow museum as an example [J]. Jilin University, 2009(04): 8, 24, 38.