Welcome to Francis Academic Press

Academic Journal of Computing & Information Science, 2023, 6(11); doi: 10.25236/AJCIS.2023.061114.

An Analysis Model of Performance Index Based on Weighted Fuzzy Mutual Information


Yongfu Shan, Xiaoxiao Ma, Wei Liu, Lihao Qin

Corresponding Author:
Xiaoxiao Ma

Xinjiang College of Science & Technology, College of Information Science and Engineering, Korla City, 841000, China


To reduce the impact of single indicator analysis, imbalanced weights, and data noise in traditional performance analysis models, a weighted fuzzy mutual information multi granularity performance analysis model is proposed. Firstly, the space of educational output indicators is divided into granularity layers to avoid the problem of local analysis of indicators. The application scope of the weight method has been expanded by combining the priority graph and CRITIC weighting method. At the same time, the fuzzy mutual information method is used to analyze the overall correlation between the input indicators and the granularity layer, and the importance of the input indicators is calculated and ranked based on the combination weight. Taking undergraduate education data from a certain province as an example analysis, the results verify the rationality and effectiveness of this method.


Weighted fuzzy mutual information; Priority graph method; CRITIC method; Correlation analysis; Particle size index

Cite This Paper

Yongfu Shan, Xiaoxiao Ma, Wei Liu, Lihao Qin. An Analysis Model of Performance Index Based on Weighted Fuzzy Mutual Information. Academic Journal of Computing & Information Science (2023), Vol. 6, Issue 11: 102-113. https://doi.org/10.25236/AJCIS.2023.061114.


[1] Bayo-Moriones A, de la Torre R. Analysing the relationship between QM, performance appraisal and pay for performance [J]. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 2021: 1-28.

[2] Camilleri M A. Using the balanced scorecard as a performance management tool in higher education [J]. Management in Education, 2021, 35(1): 10-21.

[3] Kefe I. The determination of performance measures by using a balanced scorecard framework[J]. Foundations of Management, 2019, 11(1): 43-56.

[4] Tao F. Performance Analysis of Real Estate Management Entities Based on DEA Model and BP Neural Network Model[C]//Journal of Physics: Conference Series. IOP Publishing, 2021, 1744(2): 022025.

[5] Wang W, Huang X, Luo S. Measuring Enterprise Mutual Information Based on the Helix Model[J]. Journal of Organizational and End User Computing (JOEUC), 2022, 34(7): 1-17.

[6] Reis M S. Multiscale and multi-granularity process analytics: A review[J]. Processes, 2019, 7(2): 61.

[7] Brin P, Nehme M. Sustainable development in emerging economy: Using the analytical hierarchy process for corporate social responsibility decision making[J]. Journal of information technology management, 2021, 13(Special Issue: Role of ICT in Advancing Business and Management): 159-174. 

[8] Cheng X. Research on Performance Appraisal System of Middle-Level Managers in Analytic Hierarchy Process[M]//Innovative Computing. Springer, Singapore, 2022: 1779-1785.

[9] Ding Y. Performance analysis of public management teaching practice training based on artificial intelligence technology[J]. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 2021, 40(2): 3787-3800.

[10] Lou Z, Wang Y, Lu S, et al. Minimalist module analysis for fault detection and localization[J]. Scientific reports, 2021, 11(1): 1-13. 

[11] Liao S, Zhu Q, Qian Y, et al. Multi-granularity feature selection on cost-sensitive data with measurement errors and variable costs[J]. Knowledge-Based Systems, 2018, 158: 25-42.

[12] Xiong, C., Qian, W., Wang, Y., & Huang, J. (2021). Feature selection based on label distribution and fuzzy mutual information. Information Sciences, 574, 297–319. 

[13] Lin, Y., Hu, Q., Liu, J., Li, J., & Wu, X. (2017). Streaming Feature Selection for Multilabel Learning Based on Fuzzy Mutual Information. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 25(6), 1491–1507.

[14] Liu Y, Li L, Tu Y, et al. Fuzzy TOPSIS-EW Method with Multi-Granularity Linguistic Assessment Information for Emergency Logistics Performance Evaluation[J]. Symmetry, 2020, 12(8): 1331. 

[15] Cai X, Wang H, Song H, et al. An energy-efficiency-aware resource allocation strategy in multi-granularity provision for green computing[C]//2019 International Conference on Computing, Networking and Communications (ICNC). IEEE, 2019: 782-786. 

[16] Qian, Y., Zhang, H., Sang, Y., & Liang, J. (2014). Multigranulation decision-theoretic rough sets. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 55(1), 225–237. doi:10.1016/j.ijar.2013.03. 

[17] Nie R, Tian Z, Wang X, et al. Risk evaluation by FMEA of supercritical water gasification system using multi-granular linguistic distribution assessment[J]. Knowledge-Based Systems, 2018, 162: 185-201.