The Frontiers of Society, Science and Technology, 2019, 1(8); doi: 10.25236/FSST.2019.010810.
Hong Shuying
City University of Macau Cultural Industries Management Taipa, Macau. 999078, China
Public participation is a characteristic manifestation of Hong Kong's historical architecture in the development of social development. Different from the independent promotion of Western communities and the overall leadership of the mainland government, Hong Kong historical architecture has gradually formed a distinctive collaborative conservation model in practice. This paper will analyze and draw on the effectiveness of public participation in historical buildings in Hong Kong to solve the current problems of the protection and renewal of historical buildings in China, the operational modes, institutional guarantees, and public participation, and promote the preservation and renewal of historical buildings in China.
public participation; historical buildings in Hong Kong; collaborative conservation
Hong Shuying. The effectiveness of "public participation" in Hong Kong's historic buildings. The Frontiers of Society, Science and Technology (2019) Vol. 1 Issue 8: 57-61. https://doi.org/10.25236/FSST.2019.010810.
[1] Furia L D, Wallace-Jones J (2016). The effectiveness of provisions and quality of practices concerning public participation in EIA in Italy. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 457-479.
[2] Brown G, Chin S Y W (2018). Assessing the Effectiveness of Public Partici- pation in Neighbourhood Planning.Planning Practice & Research, vol.28, no.5, pp. 563-588.
[3] Samaddar S, Yokomatsu M, Dayour F, et al (2015). Evaluating Effective Public Participation in Disaster Management and Climate Change Adaptation: Insights From Northern Ghana Through a User-Based Approach. Risk, Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy, vol.6, no.1, pp. 117-143.
[4] Jabbour J R, David B (2018). The effectiveness of public participation in forest management: A, case study analysis of the Morice Innovative Forest Practices Agreement. The Forestry Chronicle, vol. 79, no. 2, pp. 329-341.