Welcome to Francis Academic Press

The Frontiers of Society, Science and Technology, 2023, 5(17); doi: 10.25236/FSST.2023.051712.

Risk and countermeasures of artificial intelligence trial

Author(s)

Pan Yinlei, Yu Jiahui, Long Jiaqin

Corresponding Author:
Long Jiaqin
Affiliation(s)

School of Law, China Jiliang University, Hangzhou, China

Abstract

Under the background of the people's courts vigorously promoting the construction of intelligent courts and accelerating the change of judicial mode, artificial intelligence has brought new opportunities for the development of judicial trials in China. Artificial intelligence trial has been widely used in China's judicial practice, and has achieved good results. Compared with the traditional judicial trial mode, artificial intelligence trial has the advantages of high efficiency and more comprehensive information provision. However, the intervention of artificial intelligence trial will inevitably have an impact on the traditional trial, causing people's concerns about judicial justice, judicial credibility and judicial accountability. The key to solving the problem is in what position the artificial intelligence trial should be placed, which determines what function it should play and the boundary of what function it should play. Therefore, it is necessary to start with the positioning of artificial intelligence trial and straighten out the relationship between artificial intelligence trial and judges. On this basis, the supporting measures related to artificial intelligence trial should be improved, that is, by strengthening the supervision of algorithms, clarifying the application boundary of artificial intelligence trial and reasonably setting up the work assessment mechanism of judges.

Keywords

artificial intelligence; judicial trial; application limit

Cite This Paper

Pan Yinlei, Yu Jiahui, Long Jiaqin. Risk and countermeasures of artificial intelligence trial. The Frontiers of Society, Science and Technology (2023) Vol. 5, Issue 17: 65-70. https://doi.org/10.25236/FSST.2023.051712.

References

[1] Lei Lei. Same-case and same-judgment: derivative obligation and representational value in judicial judgment [J]. Legal Science (Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law), 2021,39 (04): 35-48. 

[2] Ma Yuanjie. On the way of further deepening the reform of the judicial responsibility system [J]. People's Justice (application), 2017 (34): 13-19.

[3] Wang Wenyu. Judicial artificial intelligence: a new path to realize judicial justice [J]. Journal of Dalian University of Technology (Social Science Edition), 2022,43 (06) 

[4] Shen Zhai. Functions and limits of judicial artificial intelligence from the perspective of case justice [J]. Journal of University of Jinan (Social Science Edition), 2019,29 (04): 54-61 + 158.

[5] Wang Lusheng. Technical barriers to judicial big data and artificial intelligence development [J]. China Law Review, 2018 (02): 46-53. 

[6] Cao Yiyang. The application of external artificial intelligence in the judicial field [N]. People's Court News, September 10,2021 (8)