Welcome to Francis Academic Press

Academic Journal of Computing & Information Science, 2023, 6(12); doi: 10.25236/AJCIS.2023.061210.

Aftershock predict based on convolution neural networks

Author(s)

Zhijun Li1, Gege Jin2, Hongmei Yin3, Chen Chen4, Jiyong Hua1

Corresponding Author:
Jiyong Hua
Affiliation(s)

1Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China

2Yangzhou Technician Branch, Jiangsu United Vocational and Technical College,  Yangzhou, China

3Yangzhou Customs, Yangzhou, China

4Jiangsu College of Tourism, Yangzhou, China

Abstract

Earthquake prediction is a difficult task. Constrained within a certain spatiotemporal range, earthquakes are only a probability event. In a large area, predicting earthquakes based on geographical events that have already occurred is reliable. Predicting the duration of aftershocks under the condition that a major earthquake has already occurred is the research content of this article. Extract 6 features from seismic phase data to predict the aftershock period. We constructed a convolutional neural network model, sorted out 855 data from 1351 data, and trained the network. The accuracy of training verification reaches 90%, and the accuracy of testing reaches 100%. After further refinement, this model can be used to predict the duration of aftershocks in earthquakes. Provide data guidance for earthquake rescue.

Keywords

Convolution Neural Network; Aftershock Predict; Earthquake Predict

Cite This Paper

Zhijun Li, Gege Jin, Hongmei Yin, Chen Chen, Jiyong Hua. Aftershock predict based on convolution neural networks. Academic Journal of Computing & Information Science (2023), Vol. 6, Issue 12: 90-96. https://doi.org/10.25236/AJCIS.2023.061210.

References

[1] Helene J, Tiziana R, Caroline B, Cliodhna O, et al. Stigma in Science: The Case of Earthquake Prediction [J]. Disasters, 2018, 42(1): 81-100.

[2] Asmae Berhich, Fatima-Zahra Belouadha, Mohammed Issam Kabbaj. Lstm-Based Models for Earthquake Prediction[C]. International Conference on Networking, 2020: 46:1-46:7.

[3] Saba Sehrish, Faraz Ahsan, Sajjad Mohsin. BAT-ANN based earthquake prediction for Pakistan region. [J]. Soft computing, 2017, 21(19): 5805-5813.

[4] Chang-Qing Li, Xiao-Ping Zhou. Laboratory Earthquake Prediction of Granite [J]. Tribology International, 2021, 160.

[5] G. Molchan, L. Romashkova, A. Peresan. On some methods for assessing earthquake predictions [J]. Geophysical journal international, 2017, 210(3.0): 1474-1480.

[6] C. Cattania, P. Segall. Crack Models of Repeating Earthquakes Predict Observed Moment‐Recurrence Scaling [J]. Journal of geophysical research. Solid earth, 2019, 124(1): 476-503.

[7] Qianlong W, Yifan G, Lixing Y, Pan L, et al. Earthquake Prediction based on Spatio-Temporal Data Mining: An LSTM Network Approach[J], IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computing, 2020, 8(1): 148-158.

[8] Valeri Gitis, Alexander Derendyaev, Konstantin N. Petrov. Analyzing the Performance of Gps Data for Earthquake Prediction [J]. Remote sensing, 2021, 13(9): 1842.

[9] Rui L, Xiaobo L, Shuowei L, Haipeng Y, Jianfeng Q, Lei Z, et al. Dlep: A Deep Learning Model For Earthquake Prediction[C]. IEEE International Joint Conference on Neural Network, 2020: 1-8.

[10] William H. Prescott. Pre-earthquake processes: a multidisciplinary approach to earthquake prediction studies [J]. International geology review, 2019, 61.0(16): 2080.0-2082.0.

[11] Danijel S, M. W, Warner M, Thomas H J, Yosihiko O, David D J, Sum M, David A R, Matthew C G, Naoshi H, Maria L, Philip J M, Anne S, Matteo T, Stefan W, Jeremy D Z, Jiancang Z, et al. The Collaboratory for the Study of Earthquake Predictability: Achievements and Priorities [J]. Seismological Research Letters, 2018, 89(4): 1305-1313.

[12] Gualberto A C, Francisco M, A. M, Jorge R, et al. A sensitivity study of seismicity indicators in supervised learning to improve earthquake prediction. [J]. Knowledge-based systems, 2016, 101(C): 15-30.

[13] Elshin Oleg, Tronin Andrew A. Global Earthquake Prediction Systems, arXiv preprint arXiv, 2020, 2003(07593).