To further know the impact of investment rights and interests on international trade pricing of resource products and the internal mechanism, the relationship between investment rights and pricing of international trade of resource-based products was studied by constructing mathematical model. The pricing mechanism is studied by analyzing investment rights, futures market, negotiation mechanism, trade intermediary, and characteristics of resource-based products. The results showed that the investment rights and interests were obtained through foreign direct investment. Those who have the ownership of investment rights and interests could have the weight of game in the process of negotiation, and then have a greater voice, which is directly reflected in the right of control or income for the exploitation, distribution, and transportation of the invested resource-based products. The role of investment rights and interests in international trade pricing is a supplementary mechanism of trade intermediary. There is a maximum effect of investment equity on pricing power of trade products. Beyond the critical point, pricing power will be affected, because the investor role changes to the seller role. In a word, to a certain extent, increasing investment rights and interests can have a certain impact on the pricing of resource products. Foreign investment rights and interests are vital in national strategy and social stability. The impact of investment rights and interests on pricing mechanism is mainly realized through discourse power and product allocation power. The research on the impact of investment rights and interests on the pricing mechanism of international trade has a positive significance for the follow-up research.

Huizhen Long. The Influence of Investment Rights and Interests on the Pricing Mechanism of International Trade Based on Mathematical Model. Academic Journal of Business & Management (2020) Vol. 2, Issue 1: 100-111. https://doi.org/10.25236/AJBM.2020.020111.

[1]  Zhang X, Lin Y, Wu Y, et al. Industrial land price between China’s Pearl River Delta and Southeast Asian regions: Competition or Coopetition?. Land Use Policy, 2017, 61, pp. 575-586.
[2]  Corbet S, Lucey B, Urquhart A, et al. Cryptocurrencies as a financial asset: A systematic analysis. International Review of Financial Analysis, 2019, 62, pp. 182-199.
[3]  Hou K, Mountain D C, Wu T. Oil price shocks and their transmission mechanism in an oil-exporting economy: A VAR analysis informed by a DSGE model. Journal of International Money and Finance, 2016, 68, pp. 21-49.
[4]  Xenophon A K, Hill D J. Emissions reduction and wholesale electricity price targeting using an output-based mechanism. Applied energy, 2019, 242, pp. 1050-1063.
[5]  Zhang W, Yang J, Zhang Z, et al. Natural gas price effects in China based on the CGE model. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2017, 147, pp. 497-505.
[6]  Chen T, Shen D, Jin Y, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of environ-economic benefits of anaerobic digestion technology in an integrated food waste-based methane plant using a fuzzy mathematical model. Applied Energy, 2017, 208, pp. 666-677.
[7]  Barragán-Beaud C, Pizarro-Alonso A, Xylia M, et al. Carbon tax or emissions trading? An analysis of economic and political feasibility of policy mechanisms for greenhouse gas emissions reduction in the Mexican power sector. Energy policy, 2018, 122, pp. 287-299.
[8]  Wang Y B, Liu D, Cao X C, et al. Agricultural water rights trading and virtual water export compensation coupling model: a case study of an irrigation district in China. Agricultural Water Management, 2017, 180, pp. 99-106.
[9]  Kallabis T, Pape C, Weber C. The plunge in German electricity futures prices–Analysis using a parsimonious fundamental model. Energy Policy, 2016, 95, pp. 280-290.
[10]  Wang Y, Chen W, Liu B. Manufacturing/remanufacturing decisions for a capital-constrained manufacturer considering carbon emission cap and trade. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2017, 140, pp. 1118-1128.
[11]  Lian C, Ma Y, Wang C. Low interest rates and risk-taking: Evidence from individual investment decisions. The Review of Financial Studies, 2019, 32(6), pp. 2107-2148.
[12]  Kitzing L, Juul N, Drud M, et al. A real options approach to analyse wind energy investments under different support schemes. Applied Energy, 2017, 188, pp. 83-96.
[13]  Abani A O, Hary N, Rious V, et al. The impact of investors’ risk aversion on the performances of capacity remuneration mechanisms. Energy policy, 2018, 112, pp. 84-97.
[14]  Höschle H, De Jonghe C, Le Cadre H, et al. Electricity markets for energy, flexibility and availability—Impact of capacity mechanisms on the remuneration of generation technologies. Energy Economics, 2017, 66, pp. 372-383.
[15]  Zhang M M, Zhou D Q, Zhou P, et al. Optimal design of subsidy to stimulate renewable energy investments: The case of China. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2017, 71, pp. 873-883.
[16]  Zhang M M, Zhou P, Zhou D Q. A real options model for renewable energy investment with application to solar photovoltaic power generation in China[J]. Energy Economics, 2016, 59, pp. 213-226.