This study evaluates the effectiveness of visual training on improving visual acuity in children with amblyopia. A randomized controlled trial was conducted with participants assigned to either an intervention group receiving visual training or a control group receiving standard care. Results showed significant improvement in visual acuity in the intervention group compared to the control group at 6 and 12 months. The study suggests that visual training could be an effective addition to current amblyopia treatment strategies. Further research is recommended to explore long-term effects and applicability across different age groups.

Lin Meng, Shen Meixiao. Analysis of the long-term impact of visual training on the development of visual function in children with amblyopia. International Journal of Frontiers in Medicine (2023), Vol. 5, Issue 12: 18-24. https://doi.org/10.25236/IJFM.2023.051204.

[1] Levartovsky, S. et al. Factors affecting long term results of successfully treated amblyopia: initial visual acuity and type of amblyopia[J]. British Journal of Ophthalmology, 1995, 79(3): 225-228.

[2] Suwal, R. et al. Impact of active vision therapy compared to conventional patching therapy on visual acuity and stereoacuity in children with amblyopia[J]. Journal of Optometry, 2024, 17(1): 100484.

[3] Liu, J. et al. Impact of COVID-19 pandemic control measures on amblyopia treatment: a retrospective study of records from a tertiary eye hospital in China[J]. BMJ Open, 2023, 13(7): e071839.

[4] Shao, W. et al. Effects of virtual reality on the treatment of amblyopia in children: A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Journal of Pediatric Nursing, 2023, 72: 106-112.

[5] Milla, M. et al. Long-term efficacy of the combination of active vision therapy and occlusion in children with strabismic and anisometropic amblyopia[J]. Children, 2022, 9(7): 1012.

[6] Leal Vega, L. et al. Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial of the NEIVATECH virtual reality system to improve visual function in children with anisometropic amblyopia[J]. BMC Ophthalmology, 2022, 22(1): 253.

[7] Fan, Y. et al. Clinical analysis of eye movement-based data in the medical diagnosis of amblyopia[J]. Methods, 2023: 26-32.

[8] Magli, A. et al. Long-term effects of early/late-onset visual deprivation on macular and retinal nerve fibers layer structure: A pilot study[J]. Plos One, 2023, 18(3): e0283423.

[9] Tungsattayathitthan, U. et al. Long-term visual acuity outcome of pediatric uveitis patients presenting with severe visual impairment[J]. Scientific Reports, 2023, 13(1): 2919.

[10] Shah, S. et al. Perceptual learning with hand–eye coordination as an effective tool for managing amblyopia: A prospective study[J]. Indian Journal of Ophthalmology, 2022, 70(10): 3630.

[11] Halička, J. et al. Visual training in virtual reality in adult patients with anisometric amblyopia[J]. Cesk Slov Oftalmol, 2020, 76(1): 24-28.

[12] Hernández-Rodríguez, C. J. et al. Efficacy of perceptual learning-based vision training as an adjuvant to occlusion therapy in the management of amblyopia: A pilot study[J]. Vision, 2021, 5(1): 15.

[13] Birch, E. E. et al. A pilot randomized trial of contrast-rebalanced binocular treatment for deprivation amblyopia[J]. Journal of American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus, 2020, 24(6): 344.e1-344.e5.