The three-dimensional finite element method has become the main method for studying the biomechanics of the temporomandibular joint due to its precise and non-invasive characteristics. However, the geometric similarity and mechanical simulation of different modeling methods differ, and there are significant differences in their authenticity. The principle is to use modern computer technology to numerically convert the mechanical properties of objects, establish an intuitive, time-saving, and conclusive research model, analyze the stress-strain situation of different parts, and then carry out mechanical theory research. This article will focus on the construction of geometric models of the temporomandibular joint, material characteristics and contact relationships, as well as the loading methods of dynamic loads and the establishment methods of dynamic three-dimensional finite element models of the temporomandibular joint.

Zhang Yulu, Liu Jia. Research progress on dynamic three-dimensional finite element model construction of temporomandibular joint. International Journal of Frontiers in Medicine (2023), Vol. 5, Issue 12: 109-112. https://doi.org/10.25236/IJFM.2023.051217.

[1] Lai L,Huang C,Zhou F,et al.Finite elements analysis ofthe temporomandibular joint disc in patients with intra-articular disorders[J].BMC Oral Health,2020,20(1):93.

[2] Hattori-Hara E,Mitsui SN,Mori H,et al.The influence ofunilateral disc displacement on stress in the contralateral jointwith a normally positioned disc in a human temporomandibular joint:an analytic approach using the finite element method[J].J Craniomaxillofac Surg,2014,42(8):2018-2024.

[3] Sun M, Yang J,Zhou R,et al.Mechanical analysis on individualized finite element of temporalmandibular joint underoverlarge jaw opening status[J].Int J Clin Exp Med,2015,8(6): 9046-9054.

[4] Bhargava D, Neelakandan RS,Dalsingh V,et al.A three di-mensional (3D) musculoskeletal finite element analysis ofDARSN temporomandibular joint (TMJ) prosthesis for totalunilateral alloplastic joint replacement[J].J Stomatol OralMaxillofac Surg,2019,120(6):517-522.

[5] Sagl B, Schmid-Schwap M,Piehslinger E,et al.In vivo prediction of temporomandibular joint disc thickness and positionchanges for different jaw positions[J].J Anat,2019,234(5): 718-727.

[6] Phellan R,Hachem B,Clin J,et al.Rea-time biomechanicsusing the finite element method and machine learning:Review and perspective[J].Med Phys,2021, 48(1):7-18.

[7] Martinez Choy SE,Lenz J, Schweizerhof K, et al. Realistickinetic loading of the jaw system during single chewing cycles:a finite element study[J]. J Oral Rehabil, 2017,44(5):375-384.

[8] Yan Rongzeng, Hu Min. Analysis of factors related to three-dimensional finite element modeling of the temporomandibular joint[J].Medical biomechanics,2016,31(2):182-187.

[9] Ye Pengcheng,Fang Yiming,Zhang Linlin,et al.Preliminary study on digital anatomical finite element modeling of the maxillofacial region, including the chewing system[J].Journal of Medical Research, 2016,45(4):36-41.

[10] Xu C, Reifman J,Baggaley M,et al.Individual differences inwomen during walking affect tibial response to load carriage:The importance of individualized musculoskeletal finite-element models[J]. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng,2020,67 (2):545-555

[11] Pal S,Besier TF,Gold GE,et al.Patellofemoral cartilagestresses are most sensitive to variations in vastus medialismuscle forces[J].Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin,2019,22(2):206-216.

[12] Sagl B,Schmid-Schwap M,Piehslinger E,et al.A dynamicjaw model with a finite-element temporomandibular joint[J].Front Physiol,2019,10:1156.

[13] Pang Yaqian,Liu Liang,Feng Dajun,et al.Finite element modeling and biomechanical study of cystic lesions in the central joint of the lower collarbone[J].Oral Medicine Research,2021,37(3): 250254.

[14] Kijak E,Margielewicz J,Pihut M.Identification of biomechanical properties of temporomandibular discs[J].Pain ResManag,2020,2020: 6032832.

[15] Shu J,Ma H,Jia L,et al.Biomechanical behaviour of tem-poromandibular joints during opening and closing of themouth:A 3D finite element analysis[J].Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng, 2020, 36(8):e3373.

[16] Schmitt A,Sory D,Tappert L,et al.Dynamic characterisation of the temporomandibular joint disc using split Hopkinsonpressure bars[J].Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng,2020,23(sup1): S273-S275.

[17] Skipper Andersen M,De Zee M,Damsgaard M,et al.Introduction to force-dependent kinematics: theory and applicationto mandible modeling[J].J Biomech Eng,2017,139(9).

[18] Hu J, Chen Z,Xin H, et al.Musculoskeletal multibody dynamics simulation of the contact mechanics and kinematics ofa natural knee joint during a walking cycle[J].Proc InstMech Eng H,2018, 232(5):508-519.

[19] Tanaka E, Rodrigo DP,Miyawaki Y,et al.Stress distribution in the temporomandibular joint affected by anterior discdisplacement:a three-dimensional analytic approach with thefinite-element method[J].J Oral Rehabil,2000,27 (9):754-759.

[20] Rockenfeller R, Herold JL,Gtz T.Parameter estimationand experimental design for Hil-type muscles: Impulsesfrom optimization-based modeling[J].Math Biosci,2020.327:108432.

[21] Ahn SJ, Tsou L,Antonio Sanchez C,et al.Analyzing centerof rotation during opening and closing movements of the mandible using computer simulations[J].J Biomech,2015,48(4):666-671.

[22] Mehl A.The determination of the terminal hinge axis:a fundamental review and comparison of known and novel methods[J].Int J Comput Dent,2018,21(3):201-214.

[23] Sun Q, Dong MJ,Tao XF,et al.Dynamic MR imaging oftemporomandibular joint: an initial assessment with fast imaging employing steady-state acquisition sequence[J].MagnReson Imaging, 2015, 33(3): 270-275.

[24] Wen-Ching Ko E,Alazizi Al,Lin CH.Three-dimensionalsurgical changes of mandibular proximal segments affect out-come of jaw motion analysis[J].J Oral Maxillofac Surg,2015,73(5):971-984.