N400 is a typical event-related potential that reflects the degree of matching between words and context. A public dataset was selected to explore the effect of gender on N400 by performing statistical analysis, spectral analysis, and time-frequency analysis on the EEG of 40 subjects who participated in the lexical semantic relevance judgment task. The results showed that, although the gender difference was not significant, the mean and peak amplitudes of N400 in females were overall larger than those in males, and the latencies were shorter, which proved that the N400 responses of females were overall more sensitive. The time-frequency results showed that theta waves and low-frequency beta waves were active during the time window when the N400 appeared, reflecting cognitive processing of semantic mismatch. This study provides evidence for the use of the N400 to assess semantic processing, which is informative.

Zhe Wang. Characterization of Brain Regions Based on Event-related Potentials—N400 Component. International Journal of New Developments in Engineering and Society (2023) Vol.7, Issue 9: 24-30. https://doi.org/10.25236/IJNDES.2023.070905.

[1] Lemmy Wei. Brain neural mechanisms of semantic specificity modulated by task[D]. Shaanxi Normal University,2019.DOI:10.27292/d.cnki.gsxfu.2019.000513.

[2] Dwivedi V D, Selvanayagam J. Effects of dispositional affect on the N400: language processing and socially situated context[J]. Frontiers in Psychology, 2021, 12: 566894.

[3] Holcomb P J, Neville H J. Auditory and visual semantic priming in lexical decision: A comparison using event-related brain potentials[J]. Language and cognitive processes, 1990, 5(4): 281-312.

[4] Schneider J M, Poudel S, Abel A D, et al. Age and vocabulary knowledge differentially influence the N400 and theta responses during semantic retrieval[J]. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 2023, 61: 101251.

[5] Tromp J, Peeters D, Meyer A S, et al. The combined use of virtual reality and EEG to study language processing in naturalistic environments[J]. Behavior Research Methods, 2018, 50: 862-869.

[6] Ghosh Hajra S, Liu C C, Song X, et al. Multimodal characterization of the semantic N400 response within a rapid evaluation brain vital sign framework[J]. Journal of translational medicine, 2018, 16(1): 1-11.

[7] Kutas M, Federmeier K D. Thirty years and counting: finding meaning in the N400 component of the event-related brain potential (ERP)[J]. Annual review of psychology, 2011, 62: 621-647.

[8] Laszlo S, Federmeier K D. The N400 as a snapshot of interactive processing: Evidence from regression analyses of orthographic neighbor and lexical associate effects[J]. Psychophysiology, 2011, 48(2): 176-186.

[9] Ihara A S, Nakajima K, Kake A, et al. Advantage of handwriting over typing on learning words: Evidence from an N400 event-related potential index[J]. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 2021, 15: 679191.

[10] Kallioinen P, Olofsson J K, von Mentzer C N. Semantic processing in children with Cochlear Implants: A review of current N400 studies and recommendations for future research[J]. Biological Psychology, 2023: 108655.

[11] Coderre E L, Cohn N. Individual differences in the neural dynamics of visual narrative comprehension: The effects of proficiency and age of acquisition[J]. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2023: 1-15.

[12] Yoon J A, Kong I J, Choi I, et al. Correlation between cerebral hemodynamic functional near-infrared spectroscopy and positron emission tomography for assessing mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease: An exploratory study[J]. Plos one, 2023, 18(8): e0285013.