Due to the theory of public risk and the need for social governance, non-security detention penalties for referral to public security organs have been stipulated in areas such as environmental protection, food and network security. However, in the legislation and law enforcement practice only pay attention to the final legal effect of various forms of behaviours, to the behavior of administrative subjects in the administrative process of the intrinsic relevance of the lack of sufficient attention. In the context of the modernization of the administrative rule of law for the combination of administrative subjects of law enforcement mode requirements are increasingly strict, whether the administrative acts have illegal inheritance relationship should also get the attention of the academic community.

Shen Xinlong. Study on the inheritance of illegality in non-security detention. International Journal of Frontiers in Sociology (2023), Vol. 5, Issue 16: 52-57. https://doi.org/10.25236/IJFS.2023.051609.

[1] Li Xiaoming. New Theory of Administrative Criminal Law [M]. Beijing: Law Press, 2014: 211.

[2] Ma Xun. Rational Expansion and Legal Regulation of Non-Police Detention-Along with the Rule of Law Transformation of Personal Freedom Penalty [J]. Research on Administrative Law, 2019(5): 85-94.

[3] Guan, Bao-Ying. The Reconstruction of Administrative Power in Enforcement and Punishment [M]. Beijing: Law Press 2003: 21.

[4] Fang Shirong. A Brief Analysis of the Combination Phenomenon of Specific Administrative Acts [J]. Research on Law and Business (Journal of Zhongnan University of Political Science and Law), 1996(1): 23.

[5] Zhao Xuguang. Effective Supervision Mechanism in the "Convergence of the Two Laws"-Cutting in from Administrative Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice of Environmental Crimes[J]. Politics and Law Forum, 2016(6):146.

[6] Cheng Xiezhong. The Chinese Picture of the Succession of Administrative Behavior Illegality [J]. Chinese Law, 2016 (3): 48.

[7] Xiao Zesheng. Succession of Illegality in Multi-stage Administrative License-Taking a Case of Non-Registration of Industry and Commerce as an Example [J]. Journal of National School of Administration, 2010(3):79.

[8] Ye Bifeng. On the Public Definition of Administrative Behavior [J]. Legal Studies, 1997(5):15.

[9] Zhu Mang. "Succession of illegality of administrative behavior" performance and its scope and the perspective of the relationship between statutory law norms - case judgment and the perspective of the relationship between statutory law norms [J]. Chinese law, 2010(3):178.

[10] He Bing. Succession of Illegality of Administrative Behavior: An Interpretation and Commentary on the Supreme Court's Decision on "Rice Monopoly Case"[J]. Administrative Law Research, 2019(6):63.

[11] Cheng Xiezhong. The Chinese picture of the succession of illegality of administrative behavior [J]. Chinese law, 2016(3): 49.

[12] Wang Guisong. On the Succession of Illegality of Administrative Behavior [J]. Chinese Law, 2015(3):102.

[13] Ma Xun. The Rational Expansion and Legal Regulation of Non-Police Detention-Along with the Rule of Law Transformation of Personal Freedom Penalty [J], Administrative Law Research, 2019(5): 93.

[14] Yang Jianshun. The Operation of Administrative Discretion and Its Supervision_Yang Jianshun [J]. Legal Studies, 2004 (1):5.

[15] Wang Chunye. On Benchmarking System and Its Legalization [J]. Hebei Law, 2009(6):100.

[16] Yu Lingyun. Wandering Between Standardization and Rigidity - Reflections on the Practice of Administrative Discretionary Benchmarks in Jinhua [J]. Tsinghua Law, 2008(3):57.

[17] Guan, Baoying. Administrative Discretionary Benchmark Questioning [J]. Legal Science (Journal of Northwestern University of Political Science and Law), 2013(3): 51.