Welcome to Francis Academic Press

International Journal of Frontiers in Sociology, 2020, 2(1); doi: 10.25236/IJFS.2020.020104.

Dissection of the Nature of Equity with Hohfeld's Analyses Theory on Rights

Author(s)

Limei Wang

Corresponding Author:
Limei Wang
Affiliation(s)

School of Civil & Commercial law,Northwest University of Politics Science and Law , Xi’an710122 , China
Corresponding author e-mail: wanglimeikelly @163.com

Abstract

The nature of equity has been controversial. It has been formed such relatively influential theories as ownership, claim, membership right, shareholder status' right, and independent civil right, etc. In order to reveal scientifically the nature of equity, it has been prominently used not only legal logic reasoning method but also Hohfeld's analyses theory on rights. It has been revealed layer after layer that equity is not bundle of rights, and cannot be also classified to a claim or real right. Equity is a new civil property right with the unique structure.

Keywords

nature of equity,Hohfeld's analyses theory on rights,property right

Cite This Paper

Limei Wang. Dissection of the Nature of Equity with Hohfeld's Analyses Theory on Rights. International Journal of Frontiers in Sociology (2020), Vol. 2, Issue 1: 26-32. https://doi.org/10.25236/IJFS.2020.020104.

References

[1]X.D.Zhao(2015),Corporate Law(4th edition), Higher Education Press, April 2015, pp.325-328.
[2]Z.Q.Chen(2002),The Contract of Debt without Cause, China University of Political Science and Law Press, pp. 274-275.
[3]Walter Wheeler Cook(2000), Fundamental Legal Conceptions as Applied in Judicial Reasoning by Wesley Newcomb Hohfeld, the Lawbook Exchange, Ltd. , pp. 5-36.
[4]Y.Wang(1998), Finding the "Lowest Common Denominator" of Legal Concepts: a Study on the Analytical Thinking of Legal Concepts by Hohfeld, Comparative Law Research, vol. 2, pp. 163-168.
[5]Y.S.Zhou(2006). New Company Law. Law Press, p. 232.
[6]J.H.Liu(2011). Modern Company Law (2nd edition), Law Press, p.187.
[7]T.T.Shi(2006), Company Law (2nd edition), Law Press, p. 237.
[8]P.Jiang, X.J.Kong(1994). Theory of Equity, China Law Journal, No. 1, p.75.
[9]X.J.Kong(1994). Theory of the Property Right Structure of Modern Companies (part 1) -- also on the Provisions of China's Company Law on Corporate Property Rights, Politics and Paw Forum, No. 3,  p. 49.
[10]W.Qin, Z.Y.Yang(2001). On the Bidirectional Nature of Ownership and Separation of Power and Power. dong yue lun cong, vol. 4,p. 114.
[11]G.Q.Li(2009). Utility of Equity in Corporate Governance -- from the Perspective of Property Rights of Equity, Journal of Social Sciences of Jilin University, No.5, p. 144.
[12]C.T.Liu(2007), Intellectual Property Law(3rd edition), Higher Education Press, Peking University Press, p.19.
[13]J.J.Ma, X.Y.Mei(2004). Reasons and Basic Ideas for the Establishment of General Provisions on Property Rights in China's Future Civil Code, in China Law Journal, No.4, p. 30.
[14]F.R.Pan(2010). Eequity Transfer Disputes, Law Press, pp.4-10.
[15]L.M.(2006). General Principles of Civil Law, China Legal Publishing House, p. 62.
[16]J.W.Li(2008).Corporate Law, Renmin University of China Press, p. 240.
[17]S.X.Shi(1994). Research and Analysis of Equity Issues, in Journal of Social Sciences of Jilin University, no. 4, pp. 22-28.