Welcome to Francis Academic Press

International Journal of Frontiers in Sociology, 2020, 2(1); doi: 10.25236/IJFS.2020.020109.

Regional Differences and Policy Orientation of the Agglomeration of Productive Services in Prefecture-level Cities in Jilin Province

Author(s)

Yaning Liang

Corresponding Author:
Yaning Liang
Affiliation(s)

School of Business Administration, Jilin Engineering Normal University, Changchun 130052, China
*Corresponding author e-mail:[email protected]

Abstract

Analyze the current status of agglomeration of productive service industries in prefecture-level cities in Jilin Province, identify the driving factors and driving mechanisms, study the development trend of agglomeration of productive service industries at home and abroad, and point out the development direction and model of agglomeration of productive service industries in prefecture-level cities in Jilin Province , Put forward policy recommendations to promote the concentration and development of productive service industries in the prefecture-level cities in Jilin Province.

Keywords

productive services,driving factors,policy recommendations.,Prefecture-level cities in Jilin Province

Cite This Paper

Yaning Liang. Regional Differences and Policy Orientation of the Agglomeration of Productive Services in Prefecture-level Cities in Jilin Province. International Journal of Frontiers in Sociology (2020), Vol. 2, Issue 1: 67-74. https://doi.org/10.25236/IJFS.2020.020109.

References

[1] Gerald A C,Satyajit C,Robert M(2007). Urban Density and the Rate of Invention[J]. Journal of Urban Economics,vol.61, no.3, p.389-419.
[2] Desmet, Fafchamps(2005).Changes in the Spatial Conecentration of Employment Across US Counties:A Sectoral Analysis 1972-200.journal of Economic  Geography, vol.3, p.262-283.
[3] Ellison,Glaeser,William R(2010).What Cause Industry Agglomeration? Evidence from Coagglomeration Patterns. American Economic Review,vol.6, p.1198-1210.
[4]Kucza G,Gebauer H(2011).Global approaches to the service business in manufacturing companies .Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing,vol 26,no.7, p.474-480.
[5] Roland A, John M Q, Mats W (2009). Urbanization, productivity, and innovation: Evidence from investment in higher education.Journal of Urban Economics, vol 66,no.1, p.2-15.
[6] TAYLOR P J,et al.(2003).Financial Service Clustering and its Significance for London[M].Corporation of London,p.30-45.
[7] Poon J P H,Kedron P,Baqchi-Sen S(2013). Do foreign subsidiaries innovate and perform better in a cluster? A spatial analysis of Japanese subsidiaries in the US.Applied Geography,vol 44,no.10, p.33-42.
[8] Gerald A C,Satyajit C,Robert M(2007). Urban Density and the Rate of Invention. Journal of Urban Economics vol66,no.3, p.389-419.
[9] SAM OCK PARK,KB Nahm(1998) .Spatial structure and inter‐firm networks of technical and information producer services in Seoul,Korea.Asia Pacific Viewpoint,vol 39,no.2, p. 209-219.
[10] BOITEUX-ORAIN C, GUILLAIN R(2004). Changes in the intrametropolitan location of producer services in lied  France(1978 -1997): Do information technologies promote a more dispersed spatial pattern. Urban Geography,vol 25,no.6, p. 550-578.
[11] Aslesen H W,Isaksen A(2007).New Perspectives on Knowledge intensive Services and Innovation. Geografiska Annaler SeriesB-Human Geography,vol S1,p.45-58
[12] Krugman P(1991). Geography and Trade[M].Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
[13]Del Gatto(2004).Agglomeration, Integration, and Territorial Authority Scale in a System of Trading Cities. Centralisation versus Devolution.working papers, vol 44,no. 3, p.235-342.