Welcome to Francis Academic Press

The Frontiers of Society, Science and Technology, 2024, 6(1); doi: 10.25236/FSST.2024.060117.

Peer Effect on Students’ Performance through an Interpersonal Relationship Perspective

Author(s)

Lung Tzyy-Jiun

Corresponding Author:
Lung Tzyy-Jiun
Affiliation(s)

The Department of Culture and Communication, Guangdong Business and Technology University, Zhaoqing, Guangdong, 526020, China

Abstract

Peer effect refers to the impact that peers have on the learning of a specific person. In this study, we investigated the peer effect in the class through an interpersonal relationship perspective. 195 students of the preschool educational psychology course participated in the study. The data collected consisted of gender, age, grades, familial income, number of professional certifications, temperament types, and the degree centrality of social networks about learning, entertainment, and emotional support. The results showed firstly, that students’ number of professional licenses correlated with their degree centrality of learning and leisure linages; secondly, that their temperament correlated negatively and significantly with their degree centrality of leisure linkage; finally, that the degree centrality of leisure was intermediate between the number of professional licenses and student grades. In conclusion, the peer effect is not as simple as Manski’s propositions (1993). It was influenced by the type of interpersonal relationships.

Keywords

peer relationship, peer effect, performance

Cite This Paper

Lung Tzyy-Jiun. Peer Effect on Students’ Performance through an Interpersonal Relationship Perspective. The Frontiers of Society, Science and Technology (2024) Vol. 6, Issue 1: 99-104. https://doi.org/10.25236/FSST.2024.060117.

References

[1] Asch, S.E. (1956). Studies of independence and conformity: A minority of one against a unanimous majority. Psychological Monographs, 70.

[2] Bavelas, A. (1948). A mathematical model for group structures. Applied Anthropology, 7(3), 16–30.

[3] Baldwin, T. T., Bedell, M. D., & Johnson, J. L. (1997). The Social Fabric of a Team-Based MBA Program: Network Effects on Student Satisfaction and Performance. Academy of Management Journal, 40, 1369-1397.

[4] Perkins, H. W., & Berkowitz, A. D. (1986). Perceiving the community norms of alcohol use among students: Some research implications for campus alcohol education programming. International Journal of the Addictions, 21(9-10), 961–976 

[5] Bramoullé, Y., Djebbari, H., & Fortin, B. (2009). Identification of peer effects through social networks. Journal of Econometrics, 150(1), 41-55

[6] Fortin & Boucher, 2016. Some Challenges in the Empirics of the Effects of Networks. In Y. Bramoullé, A. Galeotti, and B. Rogers (Ed.) The Oxford Handbook of the Economics of Networks. (pp. 1–29). Oxford University Press.

[7] Freeman, L.C. (1979) Centrality in Social Networks Conceptual Clarification. Social Networks, 1, 215-239.

[8] Grosser, T. J., Lopez-Kidwell, V., & Labianca, G. (2010). A social network analysis of positive and negative gossip in organizational life. Group & Organization Management, 35(2), 177–212.

[9] Jackson, L.A., & Mascaro, G.F., (2013). Interpersonal attraction as a function of attitude similarity dissimilarity and attitude extremity. Psychonomic Science, 23(2):187-188.

[10] Levinger, G. A. (1974). three-level approach to attraction: Toward an understanding of pair relatedness. In T. L. Huston (Ed.), Foundations of interpersonal attraction. New York: Academic Press,

[11] Li, Z., & Qiu, Z. (2018). How Does Family Background Affect Children’s Educational Achievement? Evidence from Contemporary China. The Journal of Chinese Sociology, 5, 13.

[12] Lincoln, J. R, & Miller, J. (1979). Work and Friendship Ties in Organizations: A Comparative Analysis of Relation Networks. Administrative Science Quarterly. 24(2), 181-199.

[13] Manski, C., 1993. Identification of Endogenous Social Effects: The Reflection Problem. Review of Economic Studies, vol. 60(3), 531-542.

[14] Rice, F. P., & Dolgin, K. G. (2002). The adolescent: Development, relationships, and culture (10th ed.). U.S.A: Allyn & Bacon. 

[15] Sacerdote, B. (2011). Peer effects in education: How might they work, how big are they and how much do we know thus far? In E. Hanushek, S. Machin, L. Woessmann(ed.), Handbook of the Economics of Education, Vol. 3, ed. pp. 249–77. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

[16] Shadrina, E.V., Oshmarina, O.E., Korenkova, M. M., & Zalesskaya, G.M. (2019). Investigation of Temperament Characteristics Influencing the Academic Achievement of First-year University Students. https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2478/paper14.pdf.

[17] Zagenczyk, T. J., Gibney, R., Murrell, A. J., & Boss, S. R. (2008). Friends Don't Make Friends Good Citizens, But Advisors Do. Group Organization Management, 33, 760-780

[18] Qiu, J. Z. (2004). Research on the types, formation, and interacting contents of intra-organizational guan-xi: from the viewpoint of social network. Mater dissertation in The Department of Business Administration of Pingtung University.

[19] Chen, H. C. (1984). The temperament types. https://www.newton.com.tw/wiki/%E9%99% B3%E6%9C%83%E6%98%8C%E6%B0%A3%E8%B3%AA%E9%87%8F%E8%A1%A8/8143813