This study aims to explore the difficulties and paths in the practice of criminal justice of environmental pollution. Using the empirical research method, combined with literature analysis, case analysis and field investigation, the current situation of criminal justice, environmental pollution influencing factors and effect evaluation were studied. In the past, judicial relief often focused on the personal and property damage of a specific subject caused by environmental damage, and usually ignored the damage to the environment itself. For example, the legal basis is insufficient, the repair target and plan are not clear, the way to fulfill the responsibility is not scientific, the responsibility and the responsibility is not clear, there is still a lot of room for discussion. Through case analysis and combined with the current situation, some suggestions are put forward for the difficulties in the process of judicial practice, to provide scientific basis for relevant policy formulation and environmental pollution control work.

Jia Ou. Study on the dilemma and path of criminal justice of environmental pollution. International Journal of Frontiers in Sociology (2024), Vol. 6, Issue 1: 73-78. https://doi.org/10.25236/IJFS.2024.060114.

[1] Ruan Jianhua. On the application of restorative justice in environmental crime [J]. Journal of Beijing Vocational College of Political Science and Law, 2017 (3): 7-14.

[2] Zeng Rui. Practical innovation and system perfection of ecological environment justice [J]. Theoretical Monthly, 2019 (2): 100-106.

[3] Li Zhiping, Tian Wenjuan. Analysis of the application of restorative measures in environmental criminal justice practice [J]. Journal of Law, 2018, 39 (12): 109-121.

[4] Zhang Xia. Research on judicial applications in ecological crime cases [J]. Politics and Law Series, 2020 (2): 112-119.